??N GI?N QUÁ HÓA PH?C T?P

X?a, tôi có xem m?t ch??ng trình hình nh? Gi?ng hát Vi?t hay gì ??y ki?u thi th? v? ca hát. Tôi nh? m?t bu?i thi giám kh?o Thanh Lam ?ã phê bình cô ca s? n? vì ch?n bài hát không ?úng tu?i. Tôi không nh? chính xác t? Diva dùng là gì nh?ng tôi hi?u ý là bài hát quá d? v?i ng??i thi, dù cô th? hi?n nó không t?. Th? là cô thí sinh này ??p chát l?i, tôi c?ng không nh? nguyên v?n, ??i ý là ca khúc ???c sáng tác không gi?i h?n ?? tu?i ng??i hát.

Lúc ?y tôi ngh? giám kh?o không sai mà thí sinh c?ng ch?ng ?úng.

Âm nh?c th? mà v?n ch??ng c?ng v?y.

Ch? c?n bi?t ch? và mu?n, ai c?ng có th? ??c Nói luôn cho nó vuông. Th? nh?ng tôi ngh? nó dành cho ??i t??ng ??c gi? n? ph?i có ít nhi?u tr?i nghi?m v?i ng??i khác phái. T?t nhiên b?n d? dàng có ???c suy lu?n này c?a tôi b?ng cách ??c l?i gi?i thi?u nh?ng tin tôi ?i, vì tôi là ph? n? ?ã k?t hôn v?a ti?p xúc Steve Harvey.

Nh?ng quy?n sách khác, n?u không h?p v?i ?? tu?i, ki?n th?c hay tr?i nghi?m... thì ít nhi?u b?n c?ng s? thu l??m ???c gì ?ó, không cái này thì c?ng cái kia. Còn Nói luôn cho nó vuông v?i nh?ng hi?u bi?t v? b?n ch?t ?àn ông s? d? là sáo r?ng, n?u b?n ch?a n?m qua h?.

*

M?t, ít khi nào tôi th?y s? ng?n g?n mà súc tích l?i phát huy hi?u qu? cao nh? trong câu tr? l?i c?a Steve Harvey v?i khán gi?:

?i?u gì khi?n ?àn ông h?nh phúc?

Steve Harvey tr? l?i: Bánh quy.

??n gi?n. Hi?n nhiên. Luôn luôn. Hài h??c. Nghiêm túc. M?i s?c thái này ??u ???c g?i lên b?i tên g?i nghe vào r?t ng?t tai kia.

Bánh quy là gì? Là m?t thu?t ng? c?a tác gi?. Tôi không ??nh gi?i thích ngh?a c?a nó vì có th? các b?n ?ã bi?t, còn n?u ch?a, hãy ?? ??u óc c?a b?n bay l??n. Tôi ??nh nói là tôi khá s?c. Anh b?n c?a tôi b?o r?ng, khi ?àn ông ??i di?n ph? n?, ?i?u h? ngh? ??n ??u tiên là hình ?nh cô ?y xoay quanh cái gi??ng. Hai quan ?i?m này là m?t ?i. Nh?ng v?i anh b?n, tôi cho r?ng ?ó là quan ?i?m c?a cá nhân anh ?y. Còn v?i Harvey, tôi có c?m giác quan ?i?m này b? ?ánh ??ng cho h?u h?t ?àn ông, th?m chí v?i tác gi? thì tuy?t ??i là t?t c? h?.

L?i nói v? gi?ng ?i?u c?a tác gi? khi nâng quan ?i?m t? cá nhân ông lên s? ?ông. Th??ng, tôi không thích cái gì tuy?t ??i c?, và tôi tin là không có gì tuy?t ??i h?t. Nh?ng Harvey h?t l?n này ??n l?n khác làm tôi không có thi?n c?m. Ông th??ng xuyên kh?ng ??nh b?n ch?t n? kia c?a ?àn ông không d?ng ? s? ?ông mà là t?t c?. Tôi không nghi ng? gì l?i c?a m?t ng??i ?àn ông nói v? suy ngh?, quan ?i?m, b?n ch?t... c?a chính ?àn ông. ?ó nh? th? h? ph?i n?i tâm mình trên bàn gi?i ph?u mà pháp y không ai khác ngoài h?. Còn gì chân th?t h?n th??

Nh?ng tôi v?n c? không tin ? giá tr? tuy?t ??i mà tác gi? th??ng nh?n m?nh.

*

Hai, tôi ngh? mình ??n v?i Steve Harvey h?i tr?, tuy r?ng n?u có s?m h?n thì c?ng ch?a ch?c ?úng th?i ?i?m n?a.

Không có ??a tr? nào ph?i l?n lên mà không có m?t ng??i cha trong gia ?ình, và m?t ph?n thiên tính trong b?n n?ng ng??i m? c?a b?n là mu?n con cái mình ???c s?ng trong m?t gia ?ình nguyên v?n n?u ?ây là s? l?a ch?n sau cùng. ?i?u này th?t ?áng giá. Nh?ng có ?áng ch?ng khi ??a con c?a b?n th?y m? nó lúc nào c?ng s?ng trong kh? s?? Ai s? ???c l?i n?u b?n t?t b?t v?i công vi?c n?u n??ng, d?n d?p, nuôi d?y con, và ch? nh?n l?i nh?ng ?au kh? và th?t v?ng, ch? không ph?i nh?ng gì b?n mu?n và c?n? Li?u có t?t cho t?t c? n?u con b?n không bi?t ??n yêu th??ng và lòng kính tr?ng là gì? Tôi th?m chí còn nghe ph? n? nói r?ng vì l?i ích c?a con cái, h? ??n gi?n s? ch? ch?u ??ng cu?c s?ng chung ???c thu x?p ?y cho ??n khi b?n tr? t?t nghi?p, sau ?ó thì h? s? ra ?i. H?nh phúc mà ph?i ch? ??i nh? th? thì lâu quá.

Nhi?t thành tán ??ng quan ?i?m trên c?a ông!

Tôi không chê trách gì quy?t ??nh c?a nh?ng ông b? bà m? ? vào hoàn c?nh này. ?ó là cu?c s?ng c?a h? và tôi hay b?t c? ai c?ng ??u không có quy?n phán xét. Nh?ng n?u là h?, tôi không ngh? mình ?? kiên trì v?i m?t gia ?ình nh? th?, và ng??c l?i, m?t gia ?ình nh? th? không ?áng ?? tôi hy sinh.

Tình th??ng mà chúng ta th??ng cho r?ng s? b? thi?u h?t n?u v?ng bóng ng??i cha trong gia ?ình có th? ???c bù ??p b?ng nhi?u cách th?c l?c quan và hi?n ??i, cho dù v? ch?ng có không còn ??u g?i tay ?p. Nh?ng ch?ng gì có th? hâm nóng tình c?m hai trái tim ?ã ngu?i l?nh, k? c? nh?ng n? c??i tràn ra khóe m?t c?a con cái. Mà tôi thì cho r?ng, h?nh phúc gia ?ình ch? ???c xem là chân th?t khi v? ch?ng c?m th?y h?nh phúc vì có ng??i kia ? bên (không ph?i l?y h?nh phúc c?a con cái thay vào, ?ó là l?p li?m).

Vì v? ch?ng là kh?i nguyên c?a gia ?ình.

Th? ngh? mà xem, n?u v? ch?ng tôi vui v? v?i nhau nh?ng con cái l?i không ngoan ngoãn thì có d? s?ng h?n là con cái vui v? (?) nh?ng v? ch?ng tôi l?i h?c h?c l?n nhau? Th?t thì c?ng khó ??a ra ?ánh giá ??y nh?ng may thay chúng tôi d? bu?n vu v? mà c?ng chóng vui v?i nh?ng ?i?u v?n v?t.

*

Ba, có ng??c ??i không khi tôi ch?a ??c C? x? nh? ?àn bà, suy ngh? nh? ?àn ông nh?ng ?ã ??n v?i Nói luôn cho nó vuông? C?ng ch?ng ai b?t tôi ph?i ??c quy?n th? nh?t c?a ông tr??c mà, ph?i không? Nh? th? tôi ?ã không chán ng?y m?i khi Harvey nh?c ??n t?a sách C? x? nh? ?àn bà, suy ngh? nh? ?àn ông su?t cu?n Nói luôn cho nó vuông. Ch? là tôi bi?t ông ?ã l?p ý ít nhi?u so v?i cu?n tr??c.

T? nhiên tôi nh? ??n Vô cùng tàn nh?n, vô cùng yêu th??ng. Trong quy?n này, Sara Imas ?ã l?p ý r?t r?t nhi?u gi?a các ph?n. ?ành r?ng nh?c ?i nh?c l?i th? c?ng có tác d?ng giúp ??c gi? ghi nh? ít nhi?u nh?ng c?ng ??ng th?i khi?n quy?n sách dày h?n m?c c?n thi?t. Và Nói luôn cho nó vuông nh? chính tên c?a nó, h?n ch? là b? khuy?t c?a C? x? nh? ?àn bà, suy ngh? nh? ?àn ông?

*

Tóm l?i, quy?n sách giúp bé gái, cô gái, ng??i ?àn bà(1) hi?u h?n v? n?a kia (ch?a tìm ???c ho?c tìm ???c r?i ho?c ?ã m?t). Còn tôi, ??c xong ch?ng hi?u thêm ???c m?y tí ngoài kinh nghi?m ?ã có: ?àn bà ph?c t?p nên khó hi?u thì c?ng ch?u ?i. ?àn ông ??n gi?n th? mà c?ng ch? d? hi?u ?âu m?y m? ?, b?ng không, ng??i ta xu?t b?n sách vi?t v? h? làm quái gì.

____

(1) Bé gái, cô gái, ng??i ?àn bà: Tên m?t tác ph?m c?a T. M. Koxt?gova, R. I. Rakitina v?i n?i dung v? s? phát tri?n tâm sinh lý và th? ch?t t? khi bé gái m?i sinh ??n lúc là cô gái, là ng??i ?àn bà.25 s Kimberly150 59

Well, this was an extremely quick read. Personally, I don't think the book is all that bad. I actually it more than "Act a Lady, Think a Man."

I think I needed to read this book at this time as a reminder. Men aren't evil, overly stupid or lesser than equal. I do not have to use them before getting used or let my excess baggage come between me and the next best thing. In fact, I don't need to go to such extremes to protect myself and project hurts from men no longer into my life for the next guy to deal with. This book reminded met hat the change comes from me. Similar to the "Mama Gena's" series by Regina Thomashauser, Harvey yet again states that women have the power in the relationship. As "home executives" or not, we are a valued and beautiful half of the balanced yin / yang of the whole.

There's a true sense of power and self cultivated love and security in that.

The way that Harvey's text intertwined with examples is illuminating. But, the subjective level of "manilness" that he teaches women to look for, i believe, is a bit too regional specific (Southern style) and age range specific (apart from his children, I don't know any other fellow late 20s men who have everything together he expects women to expect). I, for one, growing up in Southern California, am not at all used to the man that he paints a picture of as the male standard. But, I know what to expect when I meet one.

Now, do I believe that this book is regional specific or age range specific as his first book? No. But, I do believe that some of his suggestions to women as to how they should act in regards to a man is indicative of the expectation that the man is question actually is a Man and not a little boy in big boy clothes.

I understand his statement of appreciation regarding women who are always aware of how they look and show that they take care of themselves - and also feel that men should do the same. The "looking pretty" part of a relationship shouldn't be only on the female.

Harvey's vision, as I interpret it, is for women to drop the inflated sense of self worth of demands and rules for a man to even say hello; realize that everyone has flaws; and understand the difference between a guy that is sport fishing vs. a man that wants to be in a relationship. In this, I feel that he succeeded.

After reading this book, also I understand my parent's relationship now in more ways than I ever thought possible. That, alone, made it worth the quick read. library psychology relationships19 s Magic DropoutAuthor 7 books15

It was "OK." The problem with this book is it's teaching women how to be good mates for their husbands/boyfriends. How to make him happy, how to get along with him, how to fulfill his needs, so he can then, hopefully, give you what you want.

Okay, if you want to know "how to please your man" and be the perfect Stepford wife, I imagine this is the book to read. But what about a woman finding HER happiness, having HER needs meet, having love she wants. No, this book does not cover any topic about what YOU as a woman might actually want or need in a relationship!

Steve Harvey is a man so I don't fault him for having a one sided view of the topic. Of course he's going to tell you the mans idea of how a relationship should go and how to take care of a mans needs. That's all he really cares about, ultimately. Still, the book had it's charm and how to please and take care of a man is something women need to learn about and consider. But I'd love to read a book directed at men on how to try to understand women and fulfill our needs. But as we all know a book that will probably never sell.19 s Camille7 1 follower

This book straightend me right up when it comes to men. I know now how to chose my next man and exactly what I need to do to keep him. Kudos to Steve Harvey. If women read this and don't understand that these words are coming out of a man who has been married three times and has finally learned how to be a good man.... then they just don't want to hear the truth. It is what it is. Be smart, keep yourself updated.. looks wise and intelligence wise. Keep it real. That's basically what Steve says. Keep it real!!! Stop dreaming and waiting for a man to be your saviour. It takes two whole people to have a successful relationship!9 s WillowBe431 9

Hmmmm. One or two interesting points, but the Male as unsophisticated knuckle-dragger, and Female as all things civilized, good and gentle tactic gets very wearing. He simultaneously stereotypes men and makes them look really dumb, barely capable of learning how to be part of a household thereby justifying their behavior. Yes men should have their cake and get to eat it too! My father cooked, cleaned, diapered babies and went to PTA meetings throughout our lives and was still a real Black Man- and this was in the 70's, no less. He just did what needed to be done since my mom worked too.

I think his real point is we should be glad we even have a man. So don't push him too much, and always be nice,sweet, dangle the sex thing in front of him as incentive, but be logical too- smother those angry feelings; don't raise your voice or nag.

Really the nagging thing got me. What planet is he on where a man, asked nicely will do household chores after only being asked once? I mean, that is rare, esp if it's a chore he doesn't want to do, though he agreed to do it " He doesn't mean to forget; it's just not important to him. He can't remember all the things you want him to do. Give him the benefit of the doubt. It's not in his nature to think of these things". What about the fifth time I ask and it's not done???
I should laugh indulgently and wag my finger at that naughty old XY chromosome? After all, I do have a man.

I think he was laughing his ass off when he wrote the don't nag chapter, wondering if we'd fall for it. I'd have to say "NOPE!".

So, this book is of limited value to me, esp since my husband isn't a Black man and the cultural stuff doesn't apply (though the behavioral stuff does). But I will finish it, and ask my brothers to read it to see if they agree with his take as a sociological experiement. Next book he needs to write is how brothers can find a good black woman!!!

Update: I decided not to finish the book. It may help a lot of people, but it's not for me.say-what9 s Zero vi Britannia146 78

Hell to the No
To the tune of "Hell to the No" from Glee.

Mama said I should read this book
I said "Hell to the no."
My daddy said to give it a look
I said "Hell to the no."
Wanna make me read this shit?
Prepare to get your head split!
This book's a whole lotta
Oh oh oh oh oh
Hell to the no no n-no n-no n-no
Think I should give this book a chance?
You know what?
Hell to the no! (hell to the no!)
It'll help me with love and romance?
Hell to the no! (hell to the no!)
Try to get me to read this?
You better watch out for my fist!
It's a whole lotta
Oh oh oh oh oh
Hell to the no no n-no n-no
I said
Oh oh oh oh oh
Hell to the no no n-no n-no.african-american bad-first-impression i-read-this-so-you-dont-have-to ...more9 s Lisa794 17

I always thought Steve Harvey was just a comedian/actor, so when until I checked this out, I had no idea he gives advice to mostly single women on his own radio show.

Many of the reviewers thought this book should be subtitled, "How To Please a Man," but I think it should be subtitled, "How Not to Get Used by a Man".

I am more conservative than Steve, but thought he gave great advice! If you are single and want to avoid a broken heart and/or wasting time on some guy that is not for you, read this. Steve does go on to give advice on how to keep Mr. Right interested. So much of it is common sense: don't let yourself go and keep your relationship special by putting effort into it. If Mr. Right isn't putting any energy into the relationship, he must not be Mr. Right! Talk to him about your expectations, and if need be, move on! I'm not sure Steve said that last part, but he got close enough.

Why did an old married lady me keep listening? Steve is very entertaining--and he is right for the most part!

4-star audiobook nonfiction ...more8 s Carmen de la Rosa526 369

Este libro no es una de las historias habituales en las que alguien intenta explicar cómo piensan los hombres. Aquí es un hombre el que nos habla de sus semejantes y nos explica, mientras ven el mundo y a nosotras las mujeres.

Steve nos cuenta sobre él y sus amigos, explica cómo los hombres ven el mundo y ven como se enfrentarán en la vida, a las mujeres.

No es el primero en hacerlo y no será el último, pero estas páginas me han dado la oportunidad de pensar y hacerme preguntas que nunca hubiera pensado. Por supuesto, todos tenemos amigos que intentan explicar cómo van las cosas, pero lo que dicen no siempre es cierto.10 s Emilia P1,719 64

Aw Steve.
My boo gave this for me the day before he asked me to marry him. How prescient! This is the logical follow-up to Act A Lady, in that this assumes you've got the dude. And now you gotta deal with him and vice versa. Every few chapters Errol would say "what's he telling you now" and I would read him the handily provided bullet points, and he would say oh I already know that stuff and/or it's wrong. :)
But the basic premise of this is --keep your man happy, and tell him how to keep you happy. Obviously, overly reductive and gender-biased. Men aren't detail oriented, woman think they can change things, blah blah blah. But a fun, quick read the last one, with a few nice stories about Steve's family and his pretty awesome sounding parents. A dose of practicality in an all too muddled world of Sex Laws, I will always listen to you, if not follow you to the letter, Steve old pal.real-books5 s Buggz79147 10

There are a number of basic truths covered in this book:

1. Men are more often than not, fairly simple. Don't be fooled by that though, simple organisms are capable of fairly complex behaviour..

2. A central tenet of manliness is "Doing what you said you'd do". Which in my world translates into Integrity. And this i completely concur with.

The rest of it is told from Steve's viewpoint of the world. Some resonated deeply with me (Antinag tips) and some of it was meh (wear makeup and blazers around each other all the time).

In the end though, it got me thinking about what I'm committed to in my relationship with my wife and girls. For that alone, it was worth the read. 5 s Tatyana Naumova1,351 160

? ??? ?????, ??? ?????????? ???? ? ??????? ?? ????? ???????? (? ?? ?????? ? ?????????)2018 non-fiction selfmade5 s KyaP_Stacey46

Steve Harvey's first book Act a Lady, Think a Man was a hit! It was being quoted, celebrated, recited, dictated, and read aloud holy scripture to women near and far. Single woman, married women, dating women: it didn't matter. The ladies wanted to hear what Steve Harvey had to say about love and relationships...and were thirsty for his keeping-it-real male perspective that their girlfriends couldn't [accurately] give them.

After all, it came from a man we know and love: Broderik Steven Harvey of West Virginia. A well-dressed and well-respected man with a crazy sense of humour, class, success, and at the age of 53--years of experience with matters of the heart and interpersonal relationships. The book made us laugh out loud, and nod our heads in recognition. An instant best-seller that spent months on the top of the Essence booklist, it was a must-have in the female library.

So women were now craving this perspective. This truth. The instruction. They called the man down, followed him to conferences, linked his radio show, wrote him letters and emails because they wanted to know more. And what did our friend Steve do? He gave us more.

His second book, Straight Talk, No Chaser, will sell simply based on the reputation and word-of-mouth of the first book. It includes interesting chapters such as:


•Dating by the Decades: A guide to How Men Feel About Relationships in Their Twenties, Thirties, Forties, Fifties, and Beyond
•Are Women Intimidating? Myths Versus Facts
•Every Sugar Daddy Ain't Sweet
•Let's Stop the Games: Asking Men the Right Questions to Get the Real Answers
Despite the hot topics...Straight Talk, No Chaser is not nearly as informative--or necessary--as the first was. To compare the two isn't fair. Perhaps if I read THIS book first, I would love it, and the Act a Lady...would seem redundant. But the truth of the matter is...they're pretty much the exact same book, and there is a lot of repetition in theory and advice.

My opinion: I think I got the point the first time around. Loud and clear.

Steve--now on his 3rd marriage to Marjorie Bridges--is the father of 7, and sounds he has a solid hold on his family, his kids, and his spirituality. He's lived an interesting life, and shared the highs and lows throughout his texts. He is definitely a man of good substance.

Here's what he had to share, this time around...in case you didn't get it the first time. And if you didn't get it after the first book (which was pretty straightforward!)...maybe you need more than a book to address your concerns with the opposite sex.

I'm just saying.

In a nutshell (AGAIN!):

Do your standards and requirements reflect who you are and what you're capable of giving back? - Steve believes that while it's great to tell your girlfriends about the Ph.D., 6'4", supermodel, 35-year -old with no children, and limitless riches that you "deserve" to have...that you have to make sure you're working just as hard and are just as competent yourself to expect that type of partner. If you want your man to be a scholarly businessman...you can't be laying up on the couch and collecting unemployment, hoping he'll come and save you.

Women truly interested in finding the right guy have to get over the fear of losing one - its' OK to a let a man go if he's not the right one for you. It's OK to be single for a while. You have to be willing to move on if someone isn't giving you what you want, and just trust that someone else will eventually come around.

Stop compromising your requirements to justify having a relationship with a man who won't give you what you ultimatly want - settling is compromising. It's not okay to forget about your wants and needs, and settle for security. You can never find true fulfillment this way.

Mediocre, yet common-sensical advice at best. I'm not knocking him, he's done a great thing with these books. He's kept it real (albeit a "little" bit oooold-school at times), and he's trying his best to prevent women all over the globe from delusion and despair.

I love Steve Harvey. I loved him in The Steve Harvey Show. I loved him on The Original Kings of Comedy. I even log into his nationally syndicated morning radio show The Steve Harvey Morning Show online at work to catch two jokes. I can't say I've watched him on Family Feud yet, but I'm sure he's pretty funny there too.

BUT, I think I've learned all I need to know from him about the ins and outs of the male mind. Going forward, perhaps I'd prefer to only see him selling his suits, or on a stage somewhere...making me laugh, telling crazy, irrelevant stories and punchlines, and leaving the female heart and self-esteem out if it!

"The bottom line is that the world is full of men who are willing and able to commit. Get your house in order, put your standards and requirements to use, exercise your power in your relationships, and be willing to walk away. I'm not saying this journey will be easy or quick. But it'll be well worth it." ~Steve Harvey

4 s Bjärkê16 2

Very insightful, and good continuation from his first book (Act a lady think a man).

I particularly how Steve writes as if he's talking to you, so when you read it's as if he's sitting on the couch opposite to you giving you his advice on how to keep and get your mate. It really has that one-on-one personal feel to it when you read.

The content of the book basically revolves around the way men think. He states, throughout the book, a theme of "men are simple" (In the sense that they aren't over-thinkers, or complex when it comes to particular decisions) and he gives a lot of examples and personal scenario to make it clearer for you to picture the idea. It is sexist in the sense that it's male's perspective on particular matters BUT he does shed light on the way women think and gives them advice on how to control the situation.

Personally, It's a good book.

What can you take away from reading it? Basically you don't have to comply to every word he says because persons lead different lifestyles but you can use the insight to help other female friends, and it also answers some of the questions that women have been wondering about how men feel on particular matters.
So it's a good read, I'd recommend it for older teens (15/16 plus). I think that's the age when we want answers and were experimenting with romance and relationships and honestly if your parents hadn't given you "the talk" then you'd be a fish out of water. So this can definitely give you an idea of what guys are thinking and help you avoid some of those weird relationships. Especially the ones that leave you scarred. 4 s Shannon199 3

You don't have to agree 100% with everything Steve says to get some good insights into the mind of man with this book. Quick read, some good tips that just make sense. After all, a relationship is just as much a business partnership as it is an emotional one. I especially appreciated the negotiating scenarios as some good examples of how to approach a subject. I actually used them the weekend I read the book and it worked!
4 s Equal Opportunity Reader101 25

I actually kinda Steve Harvey. He's something of a cultural relic-- everybody's tone deaf, old-fashioned cookout uncle by proxy.

That said, I don't know why so many people turn to him for relationship advice and help, and I was expecting this book to be full of obvious appeals to developing self-esteem and gross generalizations about how men and women think.

What I wasn't expecting is for it to be BORING--and it really, really is. 4 s Christina Boyle167 1 follower

Fascinating study on how men think. It's sad that much of this is foreign to me. I really enjoyed the book even though it's essentially the same as the first. I wish Steve Harvey was my friend and I could get his take on my love life.4 s Noor Abu Hassan158 17

Good Book. Very useful information .Recommended even for married couples.4 s Nada AbuHassan236 15

very useful book ,love it4 s Karen Peyton10 2

"Every Women should read this at age 15"

If you could sum up Straight Talk, No Chaser in three words, what would they be?
That way we can avoid so many bad decisions. This should be a prerequisite to dating.

What other book might you compare Straight Talk, No Chaser to and why?
I have none in my library to compare it with. This is a bible for dating men.

Have you listened to any of Steve Harvey’s other performances before? How does this one compare?
No this was my first. I wish his first book was here too. I would not hesitate in reading it cover to cover.

What’s an idea from the book that you will remember?
The 90 day rule and why.

Any additional comments?
Please bring his first book here to audibles - Think a man, act a Lady3 s Red Kedi478 20

Questo libro non è uno dei soliti racconti dove qualcuno cerca di spiegarci come ragionano gli uomini. Qui si tratta di un uomo che ci parla dei suoi simili e ci spiega, come vedono loro il mondo e noi donne.
Steve ci parla di se e dei suoi amici, ci spiega come gli uomini vedono il mondo e vedono coloro che dovranno affrontare nella vita, le donne.
Non è il primo a farlo e non sarà l'ultimo ma queste pagine mi hanno dato modo di pensare e di farmi domande che mai avrei pensato. Certo, tutte noi abbiamo degli amici che cercano di spiegarci come vanno le cose ma non è sempre vero quello che dicono.

continua...
[http://emozionidiunamusa.blogspot.it/...]3 s Ellie Revert532 13 Want to read

He's got great ideas but honestly I don't care about how to handle a man---I've got my hero and we seem to be working things out---lo, these many 47 years! I would have been reading it for Annette's sake--she can read it herself!3 s Erin E88 6

Ummmm... What was I thinking? I need to have a second look at my dating decisions....

Thought the book was increadibly interesting I am sure that it is a book I would have not considered should it now have been suggested too me.20113 s Aimee Warrington17 2

Harvey's first book was better. This one rehashes his previous stuff and splays it out in a more defensive manner (as though he's saying "no, really, this book is that other book but BETTER". It's not better though.) Pass.3 s Mai556 142

pretty much the same "Act a lady ,think a man" but it gives women more secrets and insight about men,their mentality and how women can get what they want out of man eventually.enjoyed reading it ^^mate-seeking relationships self-help3 s Basma14 8

This is a delicious fast read with an unmistakable sense of humour about how men think and react in various relationship-related situations, I've personally found it to be more fun, down to earth, and insightful than most of John Gray's books3 s Cara49

Act A Lady was ridiculous enough to be amusing. This book just pissed me off. They have more or less the same content, and I'm still not interested in the relationship Steve Harvey is prescribing.3 s Heidi19

Good book for women esp single women to read and thanks steve for givin us the real truth..all women could learn a few things3 s Mya1,468 54

This book was not as good as the first one, but it was still helpful.3 s Brena Green109 19

WRITE MORE STEVE2 s Fatima Lee37 3

Autor del comentario:
=================================