“[Heinrich] Himmler’s SS empire was vast: by the middle of the war there were as many as 15,000 Nazi camps, which included temporary labor camps and thousands of subcamps, linked to the main concentration camps, dotted all over Germany and Poland. The biggest and most monstrous were those constructed in 1942, under the terms of the Final Solution. By the end of the war an estimated six million Jews had been exterminated. The facts of the Jewish genocide are today so well known and so overwhelming that many people suppose that Hitler’s extermination program consisted of the Jewish Holocaust alone…Today historians differentiate between the camps but labels can mislead. Ravensbrück is often described as a ‘slave labor’ camp, a term that lessens the horror of what happened and may also have contributed to its marginalization. It was certainly an important place of slave labor – Siemens, the electrical giant, had a factory there – but slave labor was only a stage on the way to death. Prisoners at the time called Ravensbrück a death camp. The French survivor and ethnologist Germaine Tillion called it a place of ‘slow extermination…’”
- Sarah Helm, If This Is a Woman: Inside Ravensbrück, Hitler’s Concentration Camp for Women

Sarah Helm’s If This Is a Woman ranks among the most overwhelming and emotionally depleting history books I’ve ever read. Intensely focused and impossibly detailed, it tells the story of the Ravensbrück concentration camp, a corner of hell meant entirely for female prisoners. Somewhat lost in the shadow of the more infamous Nazi extermination centers – such as Auschwitz and Treblinka – this volume has a dual purpose, not only to reveal a forgotten saga, but to serve as a memorial of an unwritten tragedy.

It is long, it is intimate, it is painful, and it is unforgettable.

***

If This Is a Woman is over 650-pages of text, and that epic length is expertly deployed to explore the ever-evolving horror of Ravensbrück.

In its earliest days, the concentration camp was somewhat akin to an “ordinary” prison, filled with inmates accused of having violated the law. Of course, in dealing with the Nazis, it must be understood and underlined that the laws were written to protect the Nazi Party, to suppress dissent, and to separate and subjugate undesirable elements of the population. To that end, Ravensbrück was initially filled with political prisoners (such as communists) and “asocial” individuals (such as prostitutes and thieves). Though deadly from the start, Ravensbrück also saw effective prisoner protests, communication between prisoners and the outside world, and even some lucky souls who were released.

Unfortunately, this is a tale that goes from bad to worse to sickening to you-got-to-be-kidding me. There were always beatings, poor living conditions, illness and disease, and the occasional shooting, hanging, or “black transport” that shuttled the doomed to Auschwitz. Interspersed with the “slow extermination” mentioned by Germaine Tillion, there was also lethal injections, infanticide, and horrific medical experiments (including an antibiotic study in which prisoners had their legs cut open and filled with broken glass and other detritus meant to cause infections).

With the end coming, the Germans constructed at least one gas chamber (there were possibly two), and marshaled a caravan of mobile gas vehicles. This came as a bit of a surprise, as I’d been under the impression that such facilities were only used outside Germany’s borders. However, as the Germans collapsed in the east, and the Soviet Union overran the Polish death camps, the SS tried to liquidate as many witnesses as they could.

Even liberation came with a ghastly cost. There were death marches, more random shootings, and – when the Soviet Army arrived – mass rapes. By the time you hear the stories of Red Army women who had survived Ravensbrück, only to be sent to Siberia by Stalin, it is hard not to think that the world would be better off without us.

***

Helm runs her narrative through people. If This Is a Woman is constructed of personal accounts, many of them coming from a series of interviews that Helm diligently conducted. Her research has allowed a wide cross-section of the camp to tell their stories. Everyone gets heard, one way or another, whether it is a guard, a German communist, a member of the Polish intelligentsia or the French resistance, a Red Army soldier, or a British SOE agent.

With such a huge cast of characters, it is helpful to keep a running tally. Still, Helm does a wonderful job of balancing all these individual arcs. I was fully invested in everyone’s fate, and I always breathed a little easier when Helm indicated that a person had survived.

***

Cognitive scientists have shown that memory is an uncertain thing, especially as time passes. This is even more true when dealing with traumatic events. The more a person returns to a memory, the more that memory gets altered in subtle ways. Helm interviewed her subjects long after the events recalled, meaning that there are bound to be mistakes.

Helm knows this, and makes an incredible effort to corroborate where she can, using not only her contemporary witnesses, but the transcripts from war crimes trials, extant letters and documents, German admissions, and even Himmler’s diary.

It is a credit to Helm’s abilities that when certain stories struck me as odd or unly, she jumped in to explain them, or to admit that she also found the story hard to follow. When certain recollections contradicted each other, she discussed that too.

Helm is very careful with the evidence, because she knows that despite being the most well-documented crime scene in history, there are a lot of people who deny the annihilationist aims of Nazi Germany.

Ravensbrück is no exception. In particular, a certain “academic” – I won’t bother to name him – alleged that there was no evidence of a gas chamber at the camp. This is an incredible logical deduction, as the Germans dismantled the chamber for this very reason. To say that something never existed after it was destroyed in order to hide its very existence, is a line of thought almost too stupid to engage. Nevertheless, Helm provides reams of eyewitness testimony, as well as confessions by some of the Nazis charged with carrying the program out. The fact that no amount of contemporary evidence will ever convince certain deniers is simply a function of the reality that this story has no silver lining.

***

Helm is a remarkably empathetic storyteller. She even manages to give dimension to some of the guards, who could be casually cruel to the point of lethality one day, and save a prisoner’s life the next. Much more important, though, is her treatment of the prisoners, who had to make unimaginable daily calculations to survive an absurdly grotesque environment.

The notion of free will in these camps is a debatable one. The paradox of Ravensbrück was that life was incredibly cheap and – at the same time – incalculably precious. To live, many survivors made what might seem moral compromises, the bending of ethical constructs in order to gain a slight edge. Some ingratiated themselves to the guards. Some worked for the Nazis. Some even seemed to perversely enjoy their authority. Yet these choices were the result of coercion, manipulation, and the ever-present threat of destruction. What the prisoners of Ravensbrück – and all the other camps – endured exists far beyond the limits of our hypothetical judgments.

If This Is a Woman rightly makes no criticisms. It also draws no lessons. There is no culminating moment when Helm shows us what it all means going forward. Ultimately, we are left to marvel at the individuals who made it, the ones who performed acts of sabotage in the factories, who smuggled out letters and documents, who used their eyes to gather proof, who held the dying in their arms, who kept on going when it seemed the only sane thing was to quit.holocaust nazis world-war-ii166 s Erin3,216 478

I understood now what this book should be: a biography of Ravensbrück beginning at the beginning and ending at the end, piecing the broken story back together again as best I could. The book would try to throw light on the Nazis' crimes against women, showing, at the same time, how an understanding of what happened at the camp for women can illuminate the wider Nazi story.

Brief History lesson
Ravensbrück, the largest concentration camp for women, was constructed in 1938 and officially opened in May 1939, the camp was situated 90 km north of Berlin. In size, the camp was second only to Auschwitz-Birkenau and by January 1945, Ravensbrück would hold more than 50,000 prisoners, the majority- women from 30 different nationalities. Although there were Jewish female prisoners in the camp, the SS saw the camp as an appropriate place to house political prisoners( Communists), "asocials"( such as the Roma)Jehovah Witnesses, prostitutes, and race defilers( women of impure race sleeping with men of the Aryan race), members of the French resistance, British female agents caught in France etc. These women were forced into labor, including making supplies for the German army at the nearby Siemens factory. Many of the Polish women became "rabbits" for the camp doctors, including sterilization, and being injected with gangrene gas. When the Auschwitz- Birkenau camp staff was forced to flee from the Soviets in Poland, Ravensbrück quickly became an extermination camp as the SS hurried to hide evidence before the Allied troops would arrive in Germany. After the war, many survivors were told that their stories of Ravensbrück didn't need to be heard or that their countrymen wouldn't be interested in learning of their suffering and so many stayed quiet.

Sorry to get personal.... but
When I was 22 and at university studying for my education degree, I attended a session in which I heard my first Holocaust survivor testimony, a man who lost his parents and all seven of his siblings in the camps, who survived Auschwitz, immigrated to Canada and for forty years never spoke to anyone about his experiences during the war. Although his closest friends knew that he was Jewish, he never told them he was a survivor of the Holocaust. He only decided to talk when the stories of Holocaust denial began to surface and he realized that he no longer could be silent. During the Q&A, a young man, a history major, asked " As a Holocaust survivor, which film "Schindler's List" or "The Pianist" has done a better job of telling the story of the Holocaust survivor?" You can imagine that all 100 people, including myself, leaned in to hear what he would say because of course we had watched those films. He thought for a long moment and said " Honestly, if Hollywood were ever to make a movie on what we all went through in those camps, no one in Canada or the United States would ever want to see it."

What he said that night lingers with me every time I read a book( or watch a movie)- fiction or non-fiction

What I thought

Sarah Helm presents a meticulously written account of what the many women of the camp endured during a six year period. The truth is that there are not many books devoted to the Ravensbrück camp and it is clear to see that Helm wants to have the voices of these women heard because for many it is the first time. It reminded me of A Train in Winter: An Extraordinary Story of Women, Friendship, and Resistance in Occupied France which also faced a lot of criticism from readers about how cumbersome it became having so many women introduced within chapters. My suggestion to future readers is to make sure you have a hard copy of the book to flip back and forth to the footnotes with ease. As well, don't be afraid to take breaks!

Each chapter or multiple chapters present testimony after testimony of what women from the different countries endured at the hands of the Ravensbrück guards, doctors, and even among one another. I had to read the book in small increments of time because there was only so much I felt that I could handle. Although Helm does her best to maintain chronological order in the text, she also does have to let the readers know that sometimes she is actually speaking with one of the survivors. So, she mentions things sitting at their kitchen table in Moscow or Israel, or Germany. I never felt this hinder my reading experience because there is also repetition of some names and events. SO, I couldn't exactly forget!

Helm also focuses on some of the recognizable names that found themselves at the camp. Corrie Ten Boom and her sister, Genevieve de Gaulle( niece of a certain French general), Mary Lindell( British nurse living in France that helped Allied airmen until she was caught by the Gestapo), British agents under the command of "The Spymistress" Vera Atkins and Germaine Tillion, who published a memoir in 1946 about her experiences in the campRavensbrück . On the subject of the Nuremberg and Hamburg trials Helm mentions that Tillion was critical and wrote to the effect;

It was impossible to try the crimes of the 'abnormal world' of concentration camps within the confines of a 'normal' court... Only the accused and the witnesses understood the 'abnormal world', which made them partners in the sharing of this awful knowledge; the rest of the world was in the dark.

The camp was a training ground or stepping stone for female guards to practice their "skills" and if they caught the eyes of their leadership, they would be able to be promoted to the "coveted" job as a guard in Auschwitz. There is actually this segment in the book where Helm details how Rudolf Höss, commandant of Auschwitz, accuses one of the commandants of Ravensbrück, of "keeping the best female guards for himself." Proving that even German high command could resort to pettiness. There are inserts all the way through of the line of thinking of the top ranking Nazis, but Helm really concentrates on providing the reader with anecdotes on Heinrich Himmler as he often visited the camps. Some I felt were interesting and others seemed ill placed given whatever the focus of the chapter was.

So why has the Ravensbrück camp been largely ignored? In her epilogue, Helm sums up some of the scholarly answers that have cropped up over the years;

It was smaller scale than many others; it didn't fit easily into the central narrative; camp documents had been completely destroyed; it was hidden behind the Iron Curtain; the prisoners were only women yet it is precisely because this was a camp for women that Ravensbrück should have shaken the conscience of the world.

I am going to leave it there because Sarah Helm goes on to say a lot of 'other ' that no doubt has and will spark great debate among many readers. It may or may not sit well with you, myself, I am still fresh from the reading and I think it will take awhile to process it all.

I could probably go on and on about this book, but I know that many people will say 'I cannot read a sad book especially about concentration camps.' Is it sad? Absolutely! 'Do I have to read this book? No, it doesn't have to be this book. In fact, if you can attend an event in your community and hear a survivor or visit a Holocaust museum, that's even better.

Thanks to all my Goodreads pals that cheered me along and have
continuously engaged with me in discussions regarding this book.kobo105 s Bel RodriguesAuthor 3 books20.9k

é muito difícil não dar 5 estrelas pra esse aqui.

valeu a pena ter demorado uns bons aninhos pra concluir a leitura (jamais conseguiria ler continuamente)vida-real womans-world world-war-ii92 s Maria Espadinha1,050 442

Ravensbruck — Um Testemunho da Força da Mulher


Mas afinal ainda há mais?
Já não foi tudo dito e redito?!
Pois é...a arca dos HSGG* é como a cartola do mágico -- cada vez que se abre salta de lá um coelho!
Este dá pelo nome de Ravensbruck e, como certamente se aperceberão, não pertence àqueles que celebram a vida, saltitando felizes pelos prados verdejantes!

Ravensbruck é um membro Feminino da Família Campos de Concentração Nazis.
E é Feminino, porque tem a ver com mulheres:
Judias , condessas polacas, contestarias do regime, prostitutas, ciganas, criminosas, testemunhas de Jeová ...
Até uma campeã de golfe britânica e uma sobrinha do general DeGaulle por lá andaram!

E que se faz em Ravensbruck?

Em Ravensbruck vestem-se roupas de algodão e há muitos graus negativos.

Em Ravensbruck trabalha-se 12 horas consecutivas (a Siemens tem por lá uma fábrica) em troca de sopas (uma por cabeça)

Em Ravensbruck há feridas deliberadamente infectadas com estilhaços de vidros e terra em mulheres cobaias.

Em Ravensbruck há socas que se enterram na neve em caminhadas para cortar lenha. Há pés que se torcem e lobos de Alsácia que se lançam sobre aquelas que caem!

Em Ravensbruck ...


E é face a este Quadro, tão Real quanto Chocante que as palavras guerreiras se unem, revoltadas, num murmúrio de protesto:

"Será isto uma Mulher?"


Ravensbruck acrescentou mais um capítulo aos HSGG* e acima de tudo, foi um Testemunho da Força da Mulher!


*Horrores da Segunda Grande Guerra


P.S.: se suspeitaram que este quadro é apenas uma pequena amostra das atrocidades por lá cometidas, não se enganaram!76 s Christine6,841 521


Disclaimer: ARC via Netgalley.

Is anyone else, besides me, tired of movies where men do everything and are the heroes and women are mere appendages? Why, for instance, are heroic men usually highlighted in various ways from best Oscar nods to HBO mini-series to be the detective who should get smacked? This isn’t to discredit men, after all the Founding Fathers were men so simply calling them the Founders is a bit, well, facile. However, not all women heroes are suffragettes, white women saving poor Africans (don’t get me started) or surviving cancer and/or abusive and cheating husbands.

We have Band of Brothers and the Pacific. When we have shows about women in World War II, they are usually about women Miep Giles who rescued. There is little about women resistance members (unless it is a love story), spies, snipers, or tank drivers. Take for instance, the subject of Sarah Helm’s previous book, Vera Atkins, who in many cases, if she is remembered, will be remembered as the inspiration for Miss Moneypenny, who seems to be far away from Miss Moneypenny was Winnie the Pooh is from a real bear.

It should come as no surprise, therefore, that Helm’s latest book is about Ravensbruck Camp, a prison camp under the Nazis that housed women. At first glance, a reader might think that this is yet another story about women surviving victimhood, but it’s not. At least not unless you considered the Great Escape the same type of story.

Honestly, there needs to be a movie made about the woman who escaped by basically tightrope walking the fence. Seriously, calling Angelina Jolie!

Helm details not only life at the camp as well as the history of those who found themselves imprisoned there, but also the building of the place. She examines why guards wanted to work there as well as the conflict between the Johanna Langefeld, the head woman guard; and Kogel, the Sturmbannfuher. Langefeld and her relation to the camp is one of the most interesting aspects of narrative. Helms does not try to soften the woman, and more than once points out that Langefeld was an ardent follower of Hitler, but Langefeld was also conflicted for she saw Ravensbruck as a prison, and to her that meant certain things. A level of humanity that the Nazis above her were not willing to sanction.

Another great aspect of this book is that Helm brings to light the treatment of groups other than Jews and gypsies. There is a particularly gripping account of the protests and treatment of Jehovah’s Witnesses, who were subjected to all types of punishments because of their refusal to work. Helms also looks closely at political prisoners and the captured female Red Army soldiers.

The most disturbing, touching, depressing part of the book is the description on the anti-socials, largely prostitutes, whose names are largely forgotten for a variety of reasons. Helm herself is quick to note that more of her interviews and sources came from groups other than the anti-socials, mostly political and resistance figures. Helm notes that because of the opinions of the other groups as well as the lack of records means that what happened to these women is largely lost.

Additionally, Ravensbruck was not just home to lost women relatives of de Gaul and La Guardia found themselves there as well.

It is too Helm’s credit that she also focuses on what happened half, not only when the camp was liberated but also on what happened to some of the women afterward, in particular those of the Soviet Army. The book not only is a look at history that is not well known but also on how gender affects views of events as well as reaction to them.

At least Helm’s book goes a long way in bringing light on a section of World War II not often discussed.
diverse-and-women-authors history-womens history-wwii ...more70 s2 comments Jim383 92


Wow! What a chunkster of a book; basically 3 books in one! Too big a burden to carry most places, and you almost need a bipod to set the thing on while you read it. A thick, thick book...and I was riveted to every page! Any other book this dense has caused my attention to lapse at least a little, but this one caught my interest early and kept it right through to the Acknowledgements.

Ravensbruck was an anomaly as far as death/concentration camps were concerned. Officially I suppose it's a concentration camp, since the Jewish council of Germany decided it couldn't be called a death camp because only Jewish camps were allowed that dubious distinction. Never mind that an unknown number of women were murdered here, estimated between 26,000 and 90,000 but who really knows, doesn't matter, can't be a death camp. They were starved, hanged, shot and gassed, possibly cremated alive, but no death camp designation for this place. Ravensbruck was unique in that it was a women's camp, it was on German soil, and also in that Jewish women were in the minority. Clustered within the walls you would find gypsies, British SOE agents, French resistance operatives, German "asocial types" which would include anything from murderesses and prostitutes to homeless women who had lost their husbands and sons to the Reich. Eventually, captured Soviet servicewomen, taken as POWs, would also suffer here.

Sarah Helm has travelled extensively to interview the survivors of this camp, and tells as complete a story as is possible under the circumstances. Most documentation pertaining to the camp was destroyed, and much of the bit that survived was smuggled out by inmates. She tries to tell as fair a story as possible; where a German was kind, which was not unusual, it is noted. I felt particularly sorry for Johanna Langefeld, first chief woman guard of the camp, who was eventually fired for excessive kindness. As a result of the even-handed reporting, a lot of the inmates do not come out with particularly glowing report cards. There were whiners, informants, bullies, thieves, and sadists in the ranks, Helm has no reluctance in reporting this. Sometimes the inmates who volunteered to assist the guards were more brutal than the guards were.

Ravensbruck was definitely a hard luck camp that besmirched everyone involved with it, whether they wore field grey or prison stripes. Sometimes the tormentors were outside the wire, as in the case of Cicely Lefort, an Englishwoman who joined SOE at the urging of her French husband. After her capture and internment, she gets a letter from him requesting a divorce! Talk about kicking them while they're down! And Frau Thuringer, who lost three sons to the war was imprisoned by the very country they had fought for. She was murdered in a hallway.

In fact, the whole world seemed ready to crap on these women, with the exception of Sweden. The Allies would not negotiate their release with Himmler. American troops halted at the Elbe in order to let Russian troops take Berlin...meanwhile, these women are being killed in their hundreds daily. When Count Bernadotte of Sweden, on his own initiative, arranged limited release of inmates, the Americans refused them safe passage and at least one convoy was strafed by the British. The Russians finally liberated the camp...and then raped and raped and raped. They raped sick women on their cots...they raped women with babies....they even raped their own female POWs - their comrades in arms! They raped everything with a pulse and opposable digits, seemingly with very little opposition from authority. Does the Russian Army have no Military Police? What the hell is with these guys? As one woman is quoted on page 626:

"The Germans never raped the prisoners because we were Russian swine, but our own soldiers raped us. We were disgusted that they behaved this. Stalin had said that no soldier should be taken prisoner, so they felt they could treat us dirt."

I have the greatest respect for the Russian women soldiers who worked as a team and put up a brave front in captivity, but it's pretty hard not to feel contempt for the common soldiery.

I'm not going to go on and tell you about the shitty treatment many of the survivors received after liberation. You'll have to read that for yourself. This is an important book, and you owe it to these women to read it.craziness history holocaust ...more60 s Fede212

This is the best non-fictional work available on Ravensbrück, the women's concentration camp opened in 1939 fifty miles north of Berlin and liberated six years later by the Russians. To this day, Ravensbrück remains one of the forgotten horrors of the Nazi regime, with only a few memoirs by former inmates providing any account of the events that took place in the camp.
Why?

Because at the end of the war the small village of Ravensbrück happened to be in the Russian-occupied zone. The camp was therefore turned into a monument to the communist Resistence, even though no information was available to the West until the Iron Curtain fell. By then the world had already forgotten the existence of the women's lager, not to mention its victims. It's impossible to determine how many women actually died in the camp, since most of the files were destroyed in the final days of the war. Between 30.000 and 90.000 Jewish, French, Polish, Dutch, Russian women were killed through starvation, overwork, illness, beatings; not to mention the Gypsies, whose arrival was often unscheduled and left no trace of their presence in the camp.
Sarah Helm's is the first real attempt to fill the void by providing the most complete anatomy of Ravensbrück camp to date.

Helm's main source of information are British counterintelligence dossiers and interviews given by former inmates to the author herself.
She immediately warns the reader that a substantial part of the witness was deliberately turned into a means of political propaganda in the past. As a result, only the political prisoners (the 'red triangles') have been listened to, whereas the 'greens' (criminals) and 'blacks' (the so-called asocials: prostitutes, homosexuals, Gypsies and other undefined categories) were apparently not worth mentioning in any Memorial Day. Helm takes it upon herself to tell about their sufferings and remember their existence: names, stories, words said and heard are finally brought back from the limbo of oblivion they'd been stuck into for decades, and treated with the respect that is due to any victim, no matter how politically useful they may be.
However, not all the inmates were nameless, faceless, disposable nobodies from nowhere: even some influential women of the time had to endure the horrors of Ravensbrück. Milena Jesenska (Kafka's Czech lover), Olga Benario (a legendary communist activist), Grete B. Neumann (a communist who was imprisoned in one of Stalin's camps and subsequently handed out to the Nazis), British secret agent Yvonne Basaden were among Ravensbrück's celebrities struggling for survival - their own as well as the other women's.

Helm's work becomes unbearably though necessarily detailed when it describes the medical experiments that took place in the camp. Such unlimited supply of human guinea pigs allowed the SS doctors to freely perform surgical experiments on the prisoners, funded by the army and the largest farmaceutical firms. The Ravensbrück doctors, some of whom were female, crippled dozens of Poles while experimenting on their leg bones. Those most unfortunate women were called 'Rabbits'. When the few survivors among this group were finally able to show their mangled shins and thighs during the post-war trials, some of the doctors were sentenced to death as war criminals.
As for the camp's maternity ward, one can easily guess what happened to pregnant women as soon as their pregnancies were ascertained, or after they'd given birth to their babies.
The camp was also involved in the exploitation of slave labour through a net of sub-camps as well as within the main lager: who wouldn't want to spare money by taking advantage of scores of unpaid prisoners? Needless to say only a small part of the war profiteers payed for their crimes.

From the moral abjection of the informers to the sadistic cruelty of the kapos (the 'Blockovas'), the reader becomes acquainted with the darkest side of daily life in a concentration camp, in which the line between courage and meanness, good and evil ceases to exist. When it comes to surviving, there's no innocence and no guilt. It's a state of the mind far beyond judgment, at least our judgment.
That's why the author also talks about the trivial aspects of the guards' lives: they were also part of it and must be remembered as such, although for different reasons. Lakeside picnics, pastimes, delightful private moments (Maria Mandl, who later became chief of the female guards in Auschwitz, would ecstatically play the piano after beating a prisoner to death), drunkenness, orgies, Olympia rolls, rivalry - most of the guards were country girls in their late teens and early twenties who got involved in a game that was bigger than them and were bound to lose control. Some of those girls happily surrendered to their worst instincts and turned into monsters, Dorothea Binz and Irma Grese (who'd become known as 'The Beautiful Beast of Auschwitz and Belsen').

On the other hand, the most outstanding acts of heroism must be remembered; some of the inmates found their death while helping a friend or sabotaging the Nazi killing machine. The Red Army women and French Résistance also played an important role in the camp underground activities, and the author praises the discipline of the Russians as well as the French prisoners' pride in their daily struggle to survive.
Alas, liberation wasn't any easier. The Red Army soldiers raped the already exhausted and dying women and looted the camp. Thus the inmates were abandoned, still suffering and starving, until the Red Cross sent buses and trains to pick them up. It took months before the women were able to join their families, provided they hadn't been completely shattered after years of war, forced migration, deportation and summary executions. Leaving Ravensbrück was often the beginning of yet another nightmare.

Sarah Helm's work is perfect.
The book is hugely informative and very well written. Its 658 pages are a tribute to six years of suffering and dying. The voices of the victims are speaking again to the outside world, to that world that seems to have ignored them for decades. Moreover, there are pictures of the women mentioned in the text: the Russian fighters, the guards, the 'Rabbits' with their crippled legs, the perpetrators on trial, the anonymous victims penned up cattle and piled up garbage.
I can't honestly say that I enjoyed this book; one doesn't enjoy reading about the abominations of history. But I wish I had read it before. It made me realise how much I don't know - no, how much I presumptuously believe to know - about heroism and depravity, forever struggling for the possession of the human soul.history nonfiction uk_irish35 s Tim230 108

Sarah Helm's brilliant book about Vera Atkinson and her SOE activities involved researching the Ravensbruck concentration camp where some of Vera's agents were taken. No doubt this was the catalyst that inspired her to write this book about the camp itself. This is a remarkably researched and constructed book. So vividly does the author bring the camp alive that practically you are living alongside these women many of whom she has personally interviewed. She gives as many names to the tens of thousands of women incarcerated as she can. This proves impossible with the many German women considered by the Nazis as asocials or criminals. I didn't know women were gassed at Ravensbruck or that women were used as guinea pigs for unspeakably cruel medical experiments. Much about this book is eye-opening. As always with books this there are poignant and obscene footnotes - the daughter of a German guard who gasses herself when she discovers what her mother did at the camp, the Russian women who survived the camp only to be imprisoned in gulags by Stalin after the war and the man who organised Red Cross buses and rescued 7000 women who was assassinated in 1947 by an extreme Zionist group because he worked for the UN as a mediator in the Arab-Israeli war. No nation comes out well in this story. There are good and bad of every nationality, every race. Rarely have I been made to feel just how deeply and grotesquely war brutalises some ordinary human beings while inspiring awesome depths of courage and generosity in others. I guess one reason we find war so fascinating is that it takes human beings to the outermost limits of their nature, both for good and evil. germany holocaust non-fiction ...more38 s Moira204 2

It has taken a fortnight to read this book…or, rather, to LIVE this book. It is haunting, horrifying and a major work. How Sarah Helm endured writing it is almost beyond belief. "Write it quickly," she was advised but here it is - over 600 pages of exhaustive research and interviews, of digging out obscure records and lively interviews. 32 s Gemma71 24

Definitely my most harrowing read for a long time. It's a brilliant achievement how vividly the author recreates the Nazi concentration camp for women and how many of the individuals, both prisoners and staff she brings back to life. You find yourself loathing the Nazis and anxious for the survival of all the prisoners whose lives she details. You find yourself living in the book. Always the best accolade any book can achieve. 25 s Steven Godin2,553 2,696


A monumental achievement in Holocaust writing. The level of detail here is just immense. At times it was impossible to put down, through a mixture of fascination, dread, horror, anticipation, outrage and even small pockets of warmth - though not often they do exist in the touching individual stories when it comes to certain prisoners, and then later on upon liberation - more on behalf of the Red Cross than those Cossack rapists. Ultimately, I was both warn out and relieved to be done, but wouldn't have had a problem if the book exceeded 1000 pages as it was that readable - helped by not being too wordy and academic. There is so much I could touch upon I wouldn't even know where to start, but two things that were of great importance to me in this book - 1. Interspersed throughout Helm's narrative are the voices of those lucky enough to have lived through the nightmare of Ravensbrück, and also those of the Nazi regime through the multiple trials that took place in the years after the war - and 2. Whilst Ravensbrück is at the centre of the book, Helm's extensive research expands and covers so many other areas of the war too. That's all I can really say at the moment, as it's just having walked out of the cinema after watching an intensely powerful, upsetting and brutally punishing 20 hour film, being mesmerized but feeling utterly broken, and then immediately trying to put it all into words. An incredible book.favourites great-britain history ...more25 s Bill KupersmithAuthor 1 book221

Ravensbrück


A resolution I made upon finishing Sarah Helm’s excruciatingly detailed history of Nazi Germany’s horrifying punishment camp for women is never again to compare any politician in a democracy to Hitler or persons holding distasteful views to Nazis. This was the worst. Sarah Helm was the author of Vera Atkins and the Search for the Missing SOE Women. Some of them died at Ravensbrück and most probably Helm’s research led her to attempting a full-scale history, a 700 page opus telling the story from the camp’s beginning in 1939 to its ‘liberation’ by the Soviet Army in 1945. (Inverted commas as the Russian soldiers continued their orgy of mass rape even on the camp’s survivors.) Originally the camp was intended for criminals and enemies of the regime, ‘asocials’ and Communists, but also Jehovah’s Witnesses. The latter two groups proved to be amongst the most disciplined and principled inmates. As German conquests progressed, Czechs, Poles, Russians, French women, and British agents joined them. Though the uninterrupted and mostly gratuitous cruelty—systematic beatings, starving, musters for roll-calls lasting hours in frigid weather—almost dulls the reader’s capacity for shock, the accounts of the ‘medical experiments’ were worse.

Yet this is also a story of great bravery and courage, particularly by the Polish ‘rabbits’ and the Soviet Army women doctors and their leader Yevgenia Klemm. Elizabeth Wein used this book as a source for her wonderful story Rose Under Fire, and though I cannot imagine many readers who could stomach the seemingly unremitting terrors of Ravensbrück (had I not been listening on audible on a long car journey, I couldn’t), the courage and sufferings of the victims deserves remembrance. As a male, I was continually struck by how much better women can be at forming relationships for mutual support—accounts of Japanese prisoner of war camps have a very different flavour. Not that many inmates did not behave abominably, especially the ‘asocials’ fated to perish without memorials. Understandably, the East German regime gave all the credit to the Communists and used them for anti-West German propaganda.

Though the camp commanders and authorities were all men, women played a major role as guards in abusing the prisoners and as often they seem motivated by simply doing what was expected of them, rather than acting out of innate savagery. One of them, Johanna Langefeld, actually assisted the prisoners and saved some from death. After the war she was shielded from being punished by the Polish Communists by her former prisoners. so many wartime horrors, we are left feeling that they bring out the very worst in some and the best in others. The moral is obvious but it was worth Sarah Helm's magnificent efforts as a researcher and writer. I'd place this book alongside Max Hasting's Bomber Command as the best Second World War nonfiction books I've ever read.This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.Show full reviewnonfiction22 s Book Riot Community953 204k Read

This is a detailed historical account of life in Ravensbrück, the only German concentration camp designed solely for women. It covers the camp from its inception as a place to punish the unwanted in pre-war German society (i.e. communists, Jews, prostitutes, lesbians, etc.), it’s evolution into a massive slave labor machine, and finally its conversion into a full blown extermination camp. Ravensbrück fell behind the Iron Curtain after the war and it seems that most societies didn’t want to hear about the horrors experienced by the victims. As a result, much of its history has been obscured until now. Ravensbrück deeply examines the logistics of the camp operation and the personal stories of both the prisoners and guards, lending unique insight into the psychological atmosphere of the camp. This is one of the most important books I’ve ever read–and one of the most difficult.
–Kate Scott



from The Best Books We Read In February: http://bookriot.com/2016/03/01/riot-r...17 s Kirsty2,712 175

In If This is a Woman, Sarah Helm has written utterly phenomenal study. She tells of the atrocities of Ravensbruck, a German concentration camp during the Second World War, and the only one of its kind exclusively for women prisoners. It is the first book to write extensively about Ravensbruck, one of the final camps to be liberated by the Russians.

Only ten percent of Ravensbruck's prisoners were Jewish, contrary to a lot of other camps; the rest were arrested due to opposition to the Nazi Party, and were drawn from such groups as communists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and members of the Resistance in various European countries. There were also others deemed 'asocials', who ranged from lesbians to Gypsies. Among the prisoners were 'the cream of Europe's women', including various countesses, a former British golfing champion, and the niece of General de Gaulle.

Helm draws upon the published testimonies of Ravensbruck's prisoners, as well as seeking out those who survived the brutal conditions, and studying records of the court case which followed, aiming as it did to punish those who were in charge. Her research has been carried out impeccably, particularly considering that the majority of the papers relating to prisoners and conditions were burnt before liberation. Helm has aimed to create 'a biography of Ravensbruck beginning at the beginning and ending at the end, piecing the broken story back together again as best I could'. The death toll from the camp is unknown, but is estimated to be somewhere between 30,000 and 90,000.

Helm's writing style is immensely readable, and her research meticulous. If This is a Woman is such a well paced account, and the author never shies away from demonstrating how harrowing the conditions were, and how horrific the injuries and deaths which many within Ravensbruck faced. In trying to tell the individual stories of as many women as she possibly could, both prisoners and those who guarded them, she has added an invaluable biography to the field of Holocaust and Second World War studies.

If This is a Woman won the Longman-History Today Prize, which was incredibly well deserved. One can only hope that further accolades follow. If This is a Woman is, without a doubt, one of my favourite historical studies in terms of its far-reaching material and the sensitivity which has been continually demonstrated, as well as one of my books of the year.favourites july-201715 s BAM has no time for doctors anymore let me just hand you $50001,953 429

Audio # 32

Just so brutally candid and a bit long but there was so much to cover
Otherwise I'm not passing judgment
It was well written and the stories are painfulholocaust library15 s Steven Z.613 134

It has been seventy years since the liberation of the Nazi concentration camps at the end of World War II. One would think that there would be very little to learn about what occurred during the Nazi genocide of European Jews and persecution of other minorities and groups during the war, but that is not the case. In Sarah Helm’s new work, RAVENSBRUCK: LIFE AND DEATH IN HITLER’S CONCENTRATION CAMP FOR WOMEN, the author reconstructs the history of the camp whose documentation was mostly hidden from the west during the Cold War. Once the “iron curtain” was lifted in 1989 more and more documents and other materials have been released from East German and Soviet archives. This allowed the author to provide the inmates of long ago a voice from “the special camp” created by Heinrich Himmler for women, a place ethnologist and survivor Germaine Tillion describes as “a place of slow extermination.” The camp, located fifty miles north of Berlin opened in May, 1939 and was liberated by the Russians six years later. The camp was not designated exclusively for Jews who made up about 10% of its inmates, but Jewish prisoners represented roughly 20% of those who perished. According to Helm’s, at its peak the site housed 45,000 prisoners and by the end of the war roughly 130,000 women passed through its gates to “be beaten, starved, worked to death, poisoned, executed, and gassed.” Because of the paucity of records the final death toll is estimated at between 30,000 and 90,000, but we will never be sure. Wholesale destruction of records has kept the story somewhat obscure, but due to Helm’s relentless and assiduous research we have the most accurate and complete history of what took place there.

Ravensbruck, as most concentration camps was not built at the start as an extermination center, it evolved. It began as a place to house women arrested for various crimes, including statements that were deemed as offensive to Adolf Hitler, working for the resistance of foreign countries, espionage, or just being in the wrong place at the wrong time. At the outset prisoners were categorized as political, asocial, Jews, and Jehovah’s Witnesses and the camp was broken down into blocks to separate these groups. Himmler’s plan was to make the camp self-sufficient and have the prisoners police themselves as much as possible. The Nazi SS chose individuals to be Kapos to supervise slave labor and carry out administrative tasks to minimize the cost of running the camps and freeing up SS personnel. The Kapos were appointed as barracks heads and many were worse than the SS guards themselves. The narrative parallels the course of World War II and as it does we can see how the mission of the camp changes from a prison, to a sterilization and medical experiment facility, a training ground for female guards and personnel to administer other camps that came on line Auschwitz, a source for slave labor in munitions factories that created sub camps for German corporations Siemens, Heinkel, and Daimler-Benz, and finally an extermination camp.

As Helms weaves the war narrative she explores the daily lives of those imprisoned at Ravensbruck. She provides a detailed description of the day to day struggle that inmates had to endure. By including the life story of many individuals, whether communists, resistance fighters, prostitutes, physicians, nurses, or average people the reader gains insights into how individuals were treated and the coping mechanisms they developed as they confronted slave labor, deportations, beatings, medical experiments, and torture that resulted in so many deaths. One of the most interesting chapters describes the plight of women seized in Lublin, a Polish city which was overrun by the Germans during the summer of 1941. Helms follows the lives of these women as they traveled by train to Germany, and at each stop more prisoners are seized. Women named Wanda, Krysia, Grazyna, Pola and Maria are followed as they finally arrive at Ravensbruck were they first encounter the Chief female guard, described as “the Giantess and her hounds.” One of their most poignant observations was that the people they saw “don’t seem to have faces,” and years later all they could remember was the “din of the constant screaming of the giantess.” (165) As they adapted to their surroundings they became part of the camp social hierarchy and they developed ingenious ways to create normalcy in order to survive. Another group that Helms describes in detail were Red Army doctors and nurses that were captured. Under the leadership of one of the nurses, Yevgenia Lazarevna Klemm, whose survival strategy was to stress that her group were POWS, not typical inmates, and had rights under the Geneva Convention. She constantly reinforced the concept to the woman that loyalty to each other was paramount, and that they should not “break the [their] circle” in their dealings with the SS and Kapos. This was successful to a point, and when they were forced to engage in slave labor at a sub-camp for Siemens she instructed her people to sabotage the munitions they were forced to work on. This approach allowed a number of these women to survive, and to this day they praise the leadership of Yevgenia Klemm.

Throughout the book we meet the s of Dr. Walter Sonntag, a brutal individual who was charged by Himmler to conduct sterilization experiments and research on inmates to determine how to wipe out the sub-humans who were deemed a threat to the Aryan race as purported by Hitler and his henchman. Dr. Friedrich Mennecke a Nazi psychiatrist was brought in to determine how to choose candidates for euthanasia as these people were not worthy of life in the Nazi world view. Himmler was obsessed with “useless mouths” who did not carry their own weight and they were to be given “special treatment” as designed by Nazi doctors Herta Oberheuser, an expert in “lethal injections.” Other doctors conducted experiments on “rabbits,” specially chosen women, to determine the best way to counter bacteria by injecting it into the bodies of inmates or removing body parts to see how people would respond. The narrative does not focus totally on Nazi medical practices and hygiene, but it is important that Helms presents this material to offset any belief that Ravensbruck was just for the incarceration of its women.
Helms describes in detail how the camp administrative hierarchy carried out Himmler’s orders and its impact on the daily lives of the inmates. The inmates are the key to the narrative as Helms was able to track down numerous survivors of the camps and interview them. Many in their late eighties and nineties remember amazing details of their experiences that enhances our understanding of what they went through. Helm’s “combed through the transcripts of postwar trials of camp officials and guards and found archival material that were opened after the fall of Communism…... During the past 15 years a few other books about Ravensbruck have been published, but none as focused on as many prisoner groups as Helm’s.” (New York Times, April 7, 2015, ‘’RAVENSBRUCK” by Walter Reich) Helms’ is to be commended for her tenacity in uncovering documents that previous historians have been unaware existed. In so doing she includes excerpts of letters inmates were able to smuggle out and even mail home. In addition there are transcripts from underground radio broadcasts that provided evidence for the inmates that there messages were reaching beyond the barbed wire and watch towers that controlled their lives.

Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of the book were the chapters dealing with the International Committee of the Red Cross in Berlin and Geneva (ICRC). Headed by art historian, Jacob Burkhardt, they were fully aware of what went on in the concentration, labor, and extermination camps. Many letters and other documents were provided to them by resistance groups and governments, but they always had excuses not to take action. They refused to give out Red Cross parcels, make broadcasts, help with visas and transportation for individuals to escape, work behind the scenes, and try and influence certain Nazis that were wavering as the war went against Germany. The lack of action of the ICRC was appalling and their ever present excuse that the camps were “not subject to the rules of the Geneva Convention of 1929,” and they had to maintain their neutrality to be effective was not acceptable. In addition the perpetrator of the atrocities at Ravensbruck, Karl Gebhardt, “was a close associate of Ernst Grawitz, president of the German Red Cross, the most powerful medical figure in the Third Reich.” (333) When inquiries were made to the ICRC in Geneva they “gave the same stock answer: the Committee had no access to the camps and couldn’t intervene.” (436) We all recognize that the Red Cross was in a compromising position, but any effort on their part would have been appreciated by the inmates. Finally in April, 1945 with Sweden taking the lead in rescue measures, Burkhardt, concerned with his legacy arranged a prisoner swap of 299 French women held at Ravensbruck for 450 Germans held in France.

As the war turned against the Nazis more and more prisoners were seized and sent to Ravensbruck. By fall, 1944 as the Russians advanced across Poland, Hitler was forced to shut down Auschwitz, Majdanek, and other camps moving camp inmates westward. Further, with the destruction of the Warsaw ghetto more and more people arrived from the east at Ravensbruck. With the allied landing at Normandy, the fall of Paris saw prisoners sent eastward furthering the health and logistical nightmare at Ravensbruck. To make matters even worse Hitler’s decree to empty Hungary of its Jews and exterminate them furthered the spread of typhus throughout the camp. If squalor and disease was not bad enough, late 1944 saw the arrival of Rudolph Hoss, the former Commandant of Auschwitz, Otto Moll, Auschwitz’s “gassing expert,” Carl Clauberg, the mastermind of Himmler’s sterilization program, and other unemployed Nazi murderers at Ravensbruck. Helms states further that “it is no coincidence that just before these men arrived, Himmler issued a new directive requiring an immediate, massive increase in the rate of killing and construction of a gas chamber to carry it out.” Himmler’s order read: “In your camp, with retrospective effect for six months, 2000 people monthly have to die…” (469) Himmler’s reasons for issuing the order are clear, Ravensbruck was out of control with typhus and other diseases spreading and an influx of women from Auschwitz and other areas increasing. For the first time, Ravensbruck would have its own extermination facility, “becoming the scene of the last major extermination by gas carried out in the Nazi camps before the end of the war.”(654) By winter, 1945 it was decided that the camp was to be liquidated and all evidence of its existence to be destroyed. Since the building of crematorium and its components could not keep up with the demands of eradicating all inmates thousands of prisoners were sent to Bergen-Belsen, Sachsenhausen, Buchenwald, Mauthausen, Dachau and Flossenburg to be gassed, while others were force marched to their deaths as Hitler ordered that no prisoners were to be left alive when the Russians arrived. The evidence exists that killings at Ravensbruck would continue until late, April, 1945.

Helm’s has prepared the definitive biography of Ravensbruck and has done a remarkable job in compiling the stories of the women who perished and those who survived. There are a few things the author could have addressed more, i.e.; providing better documentation for the quotations that she cites, improved referencing of her sources and interviews, and trying to create a tighter narrative so the story of the camp is easier to follow. To read Helm’s book is to find oneself in a place that cannot be imagined or understood, but thanks to the author the evidence of its existence is there for all to witness. What is most important is that Helm’s narrative has allowed the victims of the Nazi horrors a means to communicate from the grave.13 s Chris Steeden448

‘At its height, Ravensbrück had a population of about 45,000 women; over the six years of its existence around 130,000 women passed through its gates, to be beaten, starved, worked to death, poisoned, executed and gassed.’

The author, Sarah Helm, has managed to write a book of 1,200 pages in length about the Ravensbruck prisoners when all prisoner documentation had been destroyed. What an amazing feat and what a terrifying insight to a truly horrific place. Relying on prisoner memoirs and letters for her research you get a real sense of the prison / concentration camp that opened in May 1939. Some police files were uncovered to add to the research. There were not many survivors that she could talk to. She gives the prisoners names and where she can some detail on their life. This makes them human and a much more difficult read because of it.

Helm goes over the medical experiments performed on the healthy prisoners as they inflict battleground wounds on them so they can try and heal them. This is absolutely sickening to read. Then they would be used as slave labour. Himmler was beginning to understand that he could put the women to work rather than killing them. All for the good of Nazi Germany of course.

You cannot believe how strong some of these women prisoners were. Not just physically but mentally as well. They would be forced to work in munition factories but they would protest and their resolve was incredible until it was either die protesting or, for example, build planes. If they did the work, they would sabotage it so that the plane would fall out of the sky due to a blocked fuel pipe that was filled with metal shavings. Did this particular example work? We are not to know but it helped the prisoners nonetheless. Prisoners did have their breaking point and suicide was a common occurrence.

War progresses but when nearing its end the Germans go into killing overdrive. It is they wanted to kill all prisoners so that there was no story to tell. This book proves there is a story to tell and how in these times we must take heed. Especially now as I am writing this review in November 2023. We cannot let this happen again, but I do fear for the world right now.13 s7 comments Kusaimamekirai691 260

This is a book that demands a lot from its reader both in terms of time and emotional commitment to the story it tells. The latter can be at times grueling, uncomfortable, and lead to a cynicism about man’s inhumanity to its fellow human being. Yet, if you are willing to give yourself to this book, there are stories of heroism, courage, and perseverance that are unimaginable.
Located on the outskirts of the small town of Furstenberg, Germany, Ravensbruck was built in 1939 as the sole women’s only labor camp in the Third Reich. It was initially built primarily for political prisoners and the Nazi resistance but as the war escalated and years passed, it became a home for women of over 20 different nationalities and cross sections of life. From doctors to prostitutes, thieves to countesses, Communists to Jehovah’s Witnesses, there were few walks of life not represented at the camp.
This is perhaps what makes Sarah Helm’s “Ravensbruck” so compelling and important. While there remains precious little documentation about what occurred at Ravensbruck (the Nazi’s were sadly equally efficient at destroying paperwork as creating it), what documentation she did find, as well as oral interviews with survivors and their relatives, is built into an almost month by month narrative of life at the camp.
She details its routines, its guards, its captives, and its utter cruelty.
We get a glimpse of what life was for the Polish women of the camp, some of whom were subjected to horrific experiments on their legs which would lead to their fellow Poles dubbing them the “rabbits”.
For the Russians and the female soldiers of the Red Army who showed fearlessness time and time again to the brutality of camp life. As well as many others who showed incredible solidarity not only with their group but at times with other prisoners as well. (Sadly, this was not always the case as prisoners who, in exchange for small creature comforts, were put in charge of maintaining discipline in each “block” and were often crueler and more violent than the Nazi guards)
The individual stories of day to day life are at times so horrific that you simply want to look away and yet there are examples of such uplifting courage in the face of death that are truly inspirational.
It is a story I knew little about and am grateful that Helm decided to shine a light on this neglected but vital part of the holocaust.
Not only because it exposes the crimes of those who otherwise would have been forgotten, but also because it gives a name to the nameless who suffered and died by the thousands. They may have only been a number and a colored patch depicting their racial or class affiliation in Ravensbruck. Some of its callous and sadistic female guards were no more than young women simply looking for steady employment. But, they were mothers and daughters as well. There were some who were traitors but far more who endured the unendurable. In short, the story of Ravensbruck contains everything evil as well as sublime about the human condition. I feel I am a better person for having read this book and learned about these women and their stories.13 s Nancy1,105 406

This book took me a really long time to read. I had to put it down for a few months. It is incredibly well researched and the author pulls no punches. The book is historical but told in categories and chronology. Ravensbruck was a concentration camp in eastern Germany built to "re-educate" women. In the beginning, the prisoners were mostly political and asocials. A large majority were Polish.

Of particular interest, Himmler allowed medical experiments to be performed on 76 young, healthy women, beginning with introduction of foreign objects in their legs to copy shrapnel. Additionally, bacteria, tetanus, typhus, staff were also administered to the women. Eventually, the doctors did experiments that removed bones, muscles, ligaments, to see if they would grow back, maiming the women permanently. Those who lived, lived under the protection of other prisoners. At all costs, the "rabbits" were to survive and show the world what had been done to them. Their physical maiming was an archetype of the abuse the women suffered every day.

So then I put it down for a few months.

In the interim, I picked up a historical fiction called Lilac Girls and recognized names from Ravensbruck. I used Ravensbruck as a reference and found myself reading it again. Ravensbruck is also the camp where Corrie ten Boom and her sister Betsy, were held.

The difference between this and other books about Ravensbruck is that this book is not one single
Autor del comentario:
=================================