Joan Cockin was an author i discovered recently on Instagram. I am not sure on whose page was she featured, but I was intrigued enough to read her. Cockin was one of the first women to become a part of British diplomatic services and wore a lot of hats throughout her eventful life. She also wrote three mystery novels, of which one is Curiosity Killed the Cat.

Set in a small village after the WW2, the book features characters who work in the ministry and the villagers. The ministry has requisitioned a country house during the war and it yet to be restored to its owners. This, and the fact that most of the ministry workers were made to billet with the villagers since the ministry took over, has created a sense of irritation on both sides. When one of the workers of the ministry is found dead in his room, Inspector Cam is tasked with finding the culprit.

The book is a well-written whodunnit, very much in keeping with its counterparts of that time. The atmosphere is created and maintained very well throughout and the central mystery is quite engaging. A vein of budding romance runs through the plot and there are hints of espionage and international intrigue as well. To be honest, I was pleasantly surprised by Curiosity Killed the Cat, even more so because Cockin's other novel I had dnf-ed. But this one i will heartily recommend.2 s Subodh Garg165

4/5

Little Biggling, a town divided between the Ministry and the local townsfolk, is brought into turmoil, when a messenger from the Ministry, is found murdered in his apartment. Inspector Cam, the local police authority, takes up the case and with professional acumen and humorous wit, manages to nab the culprit before he strikes again.

The prose of this book is wonderful. Personally, I found it quite addictive. More often than not, I found myself rereading the same para over and over, just fascinated with this charming style of writing. In my opinion, the author has gone over this book multiple times to ensure that the words are perfect in the order that they are presented in. There is no wastage of words, no excessive superfluousness and no shortage either. I think every decision made, at least on the prose front, including the vocabulary, the tone, the tense, the narration, the dialogue and the scenery was masterful. That's not to say that I think this book has better English than others. It's just that I found the prose of this book more enjoyable than others.

Moving on, the mystery is not the best that I've ever read. But it is mildly stimulating none the less. This novel is a typical example of a cozy mystery, it's just set in the 1950s. If you cozies, then you will love this book as well. Little Biggling is truly a charming place full of charming little people that live charming little lives. I really enjoyed reading about them.

Now, let's review this book we usually do:

The Detective and the Method of Detection : 4/5
The Criminal : 4/5
The Method of Crime : 4/5

The Detective of the story is Inspector Cam, the local overqualified Police Inspector. Throughout the narrative, we are shown several instances of Inspector Cam making a name for himself as a great detective. He has his methods, all great detectives do and he follows them relentlessly till he catches the culprit. A novel experience for me was reading a detective from the Police Force who was not a bumbling idiot and who was competent enough to solve even the more dire of cases on his own. Though this case was not the most ingenious that I've had the pleasure of reading, I'm sure that the good inspector would have been more than up to the task.

Nows let's talk about the Murderer and the Method of Crime. There was nothing novel about the death, the culprit or the method that they chose to apply. This book presents us with no great leap of imagination or deduction, neither on the side of the culprit nor on the side of the detective. The murderer did have a motive and yes, it was sufficiently predictable. Moreover, there was no question about the method as it was evident since the discovery of the deceased. And the detective does manage to solve the case using a lot of common sense and doesn't seem superbly more intelligent than you and I. But what the book does manage however, better than several books, is to present a simple mystery with tact and class and charm.

Overall, it was a charming book. A one-time pleasure. Highly recommended to any fans of the armchair variety.

Can't wait to read more!!!
novels Eric1,417 37

“This weaving theories, as you call it, is all I can do just yet. I’m certainly going to get nowhere by waiting for the facts to fall into place by themselves. I can only try fitting them together, one way and another, until one day—they fit.”

Thus Inspector Cam near the start of his investigation into the murder of the widely-disd civil service messenger,James Parry, whose snooping around in the still-evacuated Ministry of Scientific Research station at Little Biggling may have led to his sudden death.

Rather oddly Cam enlists the help of his friend, the local GP, but this falls by the wayside as the case increases in seriousness when the possibility of espionage enters the scene.

I enjoyed this first book in Joan Cockin’s trio of mysteries slightly more than “Villainy at Vespers” in spite of some rather treacley romances. It is tightly plotted and even with the very limited roster of suspects the author maintains doubt and tension right up to the denouement. Again, characters are vividly portrayed but without caricature and the humour is generally playful rather than facetious. Some aspects of life in Britain in the immediate-WW2 period feature, with continued rationing, billeting and government controls especially prominent.

In all, a most enjoyable read. If the third in the series is as good then there are delights still to come.

4.5 stars. Brian J6

excellent

I really enjoyed this post WW2 mystery. The characters and plot were wonderful and the atmosphere of the time was great. I would recommend the book to fans of Golden Age and those who historical mysteries
Chris Wallace Janet Farnham32

Autor del comentario:
=================================