I know I am a sucker for a Harry Hole book but this one has to be the best yet. I simply could not put it down. Nesbo spends most of the book playing mind tricks on the reader and even in the last chapter he gives things a little twist that has you sitting on the edge of your seat. Multiple murders, multiple murderers and the loss of some very unexpected people make it completely enthralling. There are more things I would to say but at the same time I do not want to give anything away that might spoil other people's enjoyment. You need to read this book knowing nothing about it except that it is really, really good.151 s Baba3,770 1,176

Harry Hole book No. 10 is pretty awesome - Harry's teaching police work and the rest of the team are working under the new (bad) Chief Bellman, when a serial killer begins to work his way throughÂ… policeman! Top drawer Harry Hole thriller with some big moments and a hard to catch or even work out, killer. Must read Nordic noir; and 8 out of 12, Four Star read :)

2014 readcrime-fiction nordic-noir131 s Maine Colonial723 190

Interesting plot line marred by too much gimmickry and manipulation

A killer is targeting police officers; specifically officers who were involved in the investigation of unsolved murders. The killer lures an officer to the scene of the previous crime and kills the cop in a way similar to the original murder. The investigators believe that if they can only figure out the killer's motive, maybe they can find this relentless killer, who has left them few, if any, other clues.

Meanwhile, a man lies in a coma in a heavily-guarded hospital room. Newly-appointed Oslo police chief Mikael Bellman worries about what the man might reveal if he ever returns to consciousness.

Nesbø sets up three main suspects in the police murders and spends most of the book manipulating the reader into thinking it's X, then Y, then Z. He also tries to generate excitement by putting characters in apparent danger, cutting away to another scene and then returning to the danger scene. Quite often the danger scene turns out to be not at all dangerous, because the mysterious threat is now revealed to be a friend or co-worker. Nesbø also frequently makes a situation seem threatening by not telling the reader who a character is, just referring to him as "he," so that the reader thinks the worst.

These gimmicks to gin up excitement and fear in the reader are so frequent and obvious that it becomes the fable of the boy who cried wolf. After he's done it a few times, the reader recognizes the gimmick and just wants to get through the scene.

There is a broader repetition in Nesbø's writing. He repeats certain key characters' places in Harry's life and plot developments involving those key characters from earlier books to this book. I can't say more without being spoiler-y, but if you've read the early books in the series, you'll spot it.

In Nesbø's serial killer books, I also feel the killer's "voice" is virtually identical from book to book. Nesbø's writing in the non-serial killer books ( Phantom, for example) is far stronger and more engaging.

Maybe I expect too much of this series, now up to 10 books. I started reading it when The Redbreast was first published in the US, and have read every book in the series, except The Cockroaches. After this long with a series, I feel I know Harry, his colleagues, enemies, and very small circle of loved ones, and I welcome reading more about them. I always find the depiction of Oslo and its society and politics fascinating. And I did read every last bit of The Police. I just wish I didn't spend so much of the time feeling manipulated and as if Nesbø had been relying more on tricks and set pieces than heartfelt storytelling.
eurocrime mystery police-procedural82 s Yun550 27.4k

Police is another solidly gripping installment of the Harry Hole series. This time, someone is brutally murdering police officers at the site of old, unsolved homicides where they have investigated and the trail has gone cold. As the body count starts ratcheting up, and it hits closer and closer to home, the police realize they have no leads, and their best investigator is not available to help out.

I feel this series is at its most entertaining and spine-chilling when dealing with serial killers, and I'm happy that this book went back to that theme. There were so many clues and red herrings in here, and for a while sinister vibes were coming off of everyone. It was great fun, and I couldn't turn the pages fast enough. About two-thirds of the way through, I started to get an inkling of what might've been going on and was pleasantly surprised when I turned out to be right, for once!

As a random aside, I'm someone who's quite squeamish and the crimes in this book are gruesome (a Jo Nesbø hallmark), but for some reason that doesn't bother me in this series. I've been trying to figure out why for the last four books, and I still can't put my finger on it. Maybe it's so outlandishly horrifying that it comes across as quite hammed up and therefore I find it to be great fun? Although if that's the explanation, I'm not sure what it says about me.

I noticed with this and the last book that even though each is a standalone and the main crime is solved, there are a few loose ends that doesn't get wrapped up and are carried over into the next book. I personally prefer my books to be wholly self-contained due to poor memory issues, but this just means I can't wait too long until I read the next one.76 s Nicole~198 260

10 stars
Police
Anyone who doesn't dare to stand up for justice should have a guilty conscience.
Police is a riveting follow up to Phantom, the previous novel in the Harry Hole series and seamlessly picks up where Phantom ended. Excerpt from the end of Phantom - The recoil made the barrel jump and the third bullet hit him in the head. He fell. Beneath him, darkness. And he plunged into it. Until it swallowed him up and swept him into a cooling, painless nothing. At last, he thought. And that was Harry Hole's final thought. That at long, long last he was free.
Nesbø's exceptionally developed characters, Beate Lønn, Katrine Bratt, Ståle Aune return in this multilayered, most creatively plotted detective mystery yet. Corruption still exists as high up as City Hall and Chief of Police.

He was asleep in there, behind the door.
The guarded hospital room smelt of medicine and paint. The monitor beside him registered his heartbeats.
Isabelle Skøyen, the Councillor for Social Affairs at Oslo City Hall, and Mikael Bellman, the newly appointed Chief of Police, hoped they would never see him again.
That no one would see him again.
That he would sleep until eternity.

There's a new series of executions in Oslo: the killer targeting police officers whose cases remained unsolved. There are no loose ends left behind, no tracks, no evidence- only vengeance. As cops are violently murdered by a killer who perfects his executions with precise detail, yet remains elusive, Oslo's Crime Squad desperately misses their old star crime solver, Hole, his sharp intuitive skills and ability to "see" what's not there.

But, Harry Hole is no longer a presence at Oslo Police.

Krimteknisk and Crime Squad must now team up to solve the murders of their own.
Beate Lønn and Katerine Bratt work so well as a team that I was distracted from even missing Hole during the first third of the book. Ståle Aune's expert mental analyses and insights into the machinations of the deranged criminal mind kept me intrigued, it was hard to put Police aside. Nesbø is a master at baiting and teasing the reader, building up smoke screens- blurring the truth, directing logic and controlling the reader's deductive reasoning.
The demented psychological plot lines are so well constructed that they could stand singularly without a doubt, but are ingenious, collectively and cohesively.

Nesbø, brilliant at crime-storytelling - informing the reader of cutting-edge forensic techniques and current psychological schools of thought; weaving in, for the appreciation of those who have read the Hole series, recognizable aspects of previous cases Harry had been involved in - takes a major risk in reinventing a character that has already morphed over these last 10 novels into a global phenomenon.
Hole's re-creation might be the greatest move he has made, raising the bar for crime fiction series' altogether, and proves Nesbø is thinking out of the box. It's what keeps him on top of the leaderboard in crime fiction, and guarantees a faithful reader turn-out for the next Nesbø production.

Well done...

Skål!
harry-hole nesbo nordic-noir49 s Barbara1,500 5,140


In this 10th book in the 'Harry Hole' series, a serial killer is targeting police officers. The novel can be read as a standalone.

*****

A serial killer in Oslo has a bizarre agenda. Time after time the murderer lures a cop to the scene of an unsolved crime, then viciously kills him/her in a manner somehow connected to what originally happened there.

Harry Hole is not available to assist the investigation so other members of the crime squad have to pick up the slack as best they can. This includes Harry's former boss Gunnar Hagen - the team leader;



Katrine Bratt - a clever intuitive detective;



Beate Lonn - who has a freakish ability to remember every face she's ever seen;



and Stale Aune - a psychologist who's determined to give up police work.



Meanwhile, there's plenty of other 'police stuff' going on in this thriller. A cop guarding the hospital room of a comatose patient is too easily distracted by attractive nurses and odd noises. A police academy student becomes infatuated with her professor and determined to seduce him. Mikael Bellman, the new police chief, is as corrupt as they come and anxious to hide his previous crimes. Thus Bellman had to suspend his sidekick - the murderous Truls Berntsen - because of an unexplained fat bank account that might draw attention to Bellman. Ironically Berntsen spends his free time stalking/obsessing over Bellman's beautiful wife. To top it off, the drug dealer Valentin - thought to be dead - seems to be on the loose and is suspected of being the 'cop killer'.



Almost everyone in this book seems to be a potential victim, including civilians close to the crime squad. This is a gripping story with fascinating characters, gruesome crimes, and surprising twists. Very good book.

You can follow my at https://bybarbsaffer.blogspot....48 s Sandy873 227

Rarely give out 5 stars but this is a no brainer

Every time I read one of Nesbo's books, I am struck again by just how good he is. The previous book ended with Harry being shot by Oleg, the young man he helped raise & son of the woman he loves. This one opens with a comatose patient lying in a hospital bed under police protection. If he could speak, he'd have a few things to say about a couple members of the force, one currently under suspension, the other the new chief.
It's been months since the shooting & Harry's old crew have moved on without him. Someone is killing police officers involved in old cases that were never solved.
That's all I'll say about the plot for 2 reasons. First, it's so complex as to be almost impossible to summarize when you could be reading the book instead of this review. Second, I don't want to spoil any surprises. Part of the joy in reading these books is trying to guess what happens next. Suffice to say, just as you think you know what's going on, think again.
Nesbo is a master of misdirection. There are always multiple characters that are candidates for the "bad guy", each with a credible motive. As the story progresses, you keep changing your mind as to the identity of the killer. There are many reoccurring characters & story lines from previous books are continued. There are shifting alliances, many hidden agendas & not all of the old crew will survive the fallout from this case. Un many authors, Nesbo doesn't shy away from bumping off a beloved character.
Tension slowly builds as we wait to see who will be the next target & you'll consider homicide yourself if anyone tries to come between you & this book. Once you're in its' grip, it's compulsive reading because you have to know how it all shakes out. Intricate plotting, sharp dialogue, compelling characters...what's not to ? You become completely invested in these people & want to see them get what they deserve, for better or worse.
I wanted to add a note about the translation. Sometimes when a novel is converted to English, it has a slightly awkward flow that reminds you it was originally in another language. Not so here. Don Bartlett has done a fantastic job, maintaining the voice of each character & the wry, dark gallows humour.
This is thriller writing at its' best with an intense pace & jaw dropping twists. If you haven't read this series before, don't start here. Get the first one. Each subsequent book is all the richer as you get to know the histories of each character & their relationships. What a pleasure!42 s James ThaneAuthor 9 books6,987

I'm frank to confess that I have no idea how to review this book, and I will also say that, to my mind, a number of reviewers and even the publishers themselves have given away key elements of the plot that will diminish the enjoyment of the book for anyone unfortunate enough to have read their comments.

Suffice it to say that I thoroughly enjoyed the book and was on the edge of my seat for much of the time I spent with it. Readers who have enjoyed Jo Nesbo's series featuring Oslo detective Harry Hole will certainly want to look for this one. One can safely say that the book opens with the murder of a policeman and that it soon becomes apparent that a serial killer is targeting police officers for some reason known only to him or herself. The tension begins to build from the first page and doesn't let up until the last. Readers will spend a good deal of time with their hearts in their throats. But best approach the book blind; don't read (other than this one, of course) and don't look at either the front or the back of the book until you have finished it.

My only reservation about this book is that Nesbo gets a little too cute for his own good here. From the beginning, he takes the reader down so many false trails that, in the end, you begin to disbelieve everything that seems to be happening. This is a relatively small complaint, but in the end, it did distract a bit from the thrill of the story. Still, a very good read. crime-fiction jo-nesbo43 s ????? ???????????Author 2 books172

?? ?????? ?????? ??? ??????????? ?????? ????? ???????????? ??? ???Â’ ??? ?? ??? ???????? ??? ???. ?????? ??? ????? ???????? ???? ? Jo Nesbo ??? ????????????????? ???? ???? ??????????? ??? ?????????. ????????? ??????? ????? ?? ?????? ?????????? ??????????? ?? ?????? ?????????? ??? ??? ????????? ?? ????????????. ??????????? ???? ?? ?????????? ?????????? (? ????? ??? ?? ??? ??????????? ?????, ? ???????? ???????, ? ????????? ??????) ???? ??? ?? ??????? ???? ? ?????? ??? ? ?(?)????! ? ??? ??? ?? ????? ? ???????? ???????. ?? ?? ???????????? ???? ??? ???? newcomers ????????? ??? ???????? ????? ???????? ?? ??? ???????? ??????.

?? ???? ??????????? ???????? ?? ?????? ???? ??????? ??? ????? ??? ????? ????? ????????? ??????????. A?????????????? ?????? ??? ???????????? ?????? ?? ??? ??? ?? ????? ??? ???????? ??? ?? ??????? ???? ??????????? ????? ??? Nesbo. ???? ???? ?????? ?? after-sun ???????? ??? ???? ???? ??????. ?? ??????? ??????? ?? ??????? ??? ????? ???? ??? ???? ????????? ??? ????????????.

«??? ???????????, ???? ?????? ????? ????????, ?????. ? ??????? ????? ???????????».
«??... ???????. ????? ?? ??? ??? ????». ??? ?????? ??????.
«?????, ???? ????????? ?????. ??? ????? ??? ? ???????. ??? ???? ????????? ??? ???????».



???????? ???????? ?????? ??????? ???? ?? ?????????? ???? ?? ??????, ????? ??? ?? ?????????????. ?Â’ ???? ?? ?????? ?? ?????????? ??? ??????? ??? ?????????? ??????????. ? ?esbo ????? ??????????? ????????? ?????? ???? ???? ?????????? ????????? ???? ??? ???????? ?? ??????????. Kudos! ??? ???????????? ? ??? ???? ?????????? ?? ????????? ??????? . ??? ??? ????? ???? ?????????? ?? ??????????/????????? ?? ??????????? ?? ??????? ??? ??????????? ??? ????????? ???? ??? ??? ????. ???? ??????? ????? ???????????? ???? ???????????, ??? ?? ???? ????????? ??? ?? ???? ?? ?????? ??? ?????? 5??? ??? ??????? ??????. ????????? ?? ????? ?? ????????? ??? ?????? ??? ???? ???????????? ?? ??? ????????????? ?????.

‘’???????????? ?????. ?? ???? ????? ?? ?????? ?????????, ???? ?? ???????????. ??? ????? ???? ??????? ??? ?????? ?????? ?????. ???? ????? ????????? ????? ?????? ?? ???????????? ??? ???????’’.my-goodies40 s Harry319 415

Book Review

The rat bit once into the leather shoe. Licked the metal again, the salty metal that protruded between the two of the fingers on the right hand. Scrabbled up the suit jacket that smelled of sweat, blood and food, so many types of food that the linen material must have been in a garbage can. She ran up the arm, across the shoulder, stopped at a bloodstained bandage around the neck. Then she scuttled up the chest. There was still a strong smell coming from the two round holes in the suit jacket. Sulfur, gunpowder. One was right by the heart. It was still beating. She continued up to the forehead, licked the blood running in a single thin stream from the blond hair. Went down to the lips, nostrils, eyelids. There was a scar along the cheek. The rat stopped again, as if considering how to get through.



In endings we find a new beginning. This scrubbing of one death into something newly born, as books in series do, from epilogue to prologue as it were takes time during which trenchant attitudes must give way to calm and patience: Is Harry Hole dead? Did a rodent - a rat - scurry elsewhere or did it drawn by his blood bury its teeth into the scar tissue on his face, and beyond into the elastic flesh and ruthlessly gnaw its way into the soft flesh of Harry's brain? Anticipation. Much a cockroach is determined when it skitters beneath our floor boards, we grit our teeth and open the book to its first page.

And then as a reader, we smirk, perhaps admire Nesbo for playing us a fiddle in The Phantom, but let's face it, we know Harry isn't dead. The publisher has declared it so by releasing this, another Harry Hole novel and let's face it: it isn't often in the history of publications that a crime series continues on without its hero. And so we sneer, fully expecting Harry to jump out at us in the first few chapters, a tall viking- figure, victorious, scarred beyond belief but somehow made new and resplendent and yes - flawed beyond redemption - once again ready to flounce his enemies.

And you'd be wrong to think it.

Flouncing his readers' preconceptions is what Jo Nesbo does for a living. Jo Nesbo is a hidden manipulator. Using vertical and horizontal control bars in different forms the book becomes an ancient form of performance in which we become his puppets; where our feelings are stretched taut strings in a morality play to which only a master puppeteer holds the key. Fool you once, fool you twice...and fool you thrice.

If you've made it this far in the Harry Hole series you understand the veracity of this.

GR friends know that what I read is crime fiction. Why I read crime fiction is an entirely different question. So, what follows is the why of it.

In painting, something happened after impressionism: post modernism and abstraction took hold moving power away from the artist to the critic (after all, none of it could be understood). In music Stravinsky was the father of such abstraction in classical music. In literature Joyce and others decided a sentence could be pages long, naturalism came to the forefront. More and more literary authors came to believe that just because they thought it, it must be good. Plot was abandoned and now readers of such writing cling to style and prose as their fix having all but forgotten the importance of plot.

But we are human beings. Almost everything we do is a choice - it is a built in mechanism from which we cannot escape. We have a cause (something we want), then a choice, and its effect. To effectively maneuver though this maze of choices we need some sort of guide that tells us what is the right choice and which one is wrong. The guides vary of course (religion, greed, self interest, politics, etc.). But there is one fundamental cause behind all of our choices and that is to be alive. All of us share this value regardless of the guide we follow and when this root cause gets threatened, as it does so acutely in the crime genre, human beings make some fascinating decisions - most ly, all the ideas and notions that place us in conflict with others disappear because we all share this value of life. In Police the entire police force usually heavily conflicted move as one to discover the killer of their own, in real life, there were no Democrats and Republicans immediately following 9-11, there were only Americans united as one. Plot is the literary equivalent of human choice. To be human is to be volitional and nowhere is this more acutely represented than in crime fiction. Literature without choice (i.e. without plot) but chock full of concepts to me is leaving out half the equation and simultaneously demanding the problem be solved.

Jo Nesbo is a master of very complex plots, a genius at exploring human motivations, the choices people make and the resultant consequences and in doing so embraces the essence of humanity. I can go into his talent at creating multiple story lines for each of his characters, some resolved and some left dangling for Nesbo's further use. I can tell you his forte at characterization is second to none. But, I'm not going to do that. Let's just say that it's fair to acknowledge that Jo Nesbo has taken over the mantle from Stieg Larsson and Henning Mankell and is now the most prominent Scandinavian crime writer today.

Police may well be Nesbo's exit strategy, or it may not. We'll never know until a possible next in the series is published.

------------------------------------------------------------
Series Review

Here's the thing about the recent popularity of Scandinavian writers and if you're a Nordic Thriller aficionado you couldn't care less about the distinction: the novels are depressed, somber, filled with ennui, a lack of humor, with flawed characters if not suffused with a strong tendency towards determinism; in short, whether you're reading Stieg Larsson, Henning Mankell, or Jo Nesbo you are ly reading Literary Naturalism. If you live in Scandinavia you might consider this par for the course, ennui is imbued into the populace (as it is also reflected in the works of prominent Russian writers - Anna Karenina comes to mind). Just as we continue to struggle here in the States with our history of slavery and the resulting racial tensions, so do Europe and Scandinavia struggle in coming to terms with Nazism and the Bolshevik revolution (More than a few reviewers have expressed their dissatisfaction with the Nordic writers' pre-occupation with Nazism). And yet, the rise in popularity of these Nordic thrillers here in the States is puzzling given our strong tendency towards literary Romanticism. We for the good guys to win, we emotion, we our heroes (as opposed to anti-heroes) we enjoy free will, and in general consider ourselves in control of our own lives.


Jo Nesbo

Having said that: there is excellence in Literary Naturalism. The above doesn't mean we can't enjoy a well written novel, an intriguing mystery, a flawed anti-hero, a well crafted story written in the style of literary Naturalism n(though Nesbo seems to be moving away from this towards Romanticism as the series progress). Still, it doesn't mean we can't enjoy the works of Jo Nesbo. I did.

In Jo Nesbo's words: "I come from a family of readers and story tellers." With a librarian mother and a father who sat before the fire and told the kids stories they wanted to hear (each repetition bringing something new to the tale) Jo's foundation was carved in stone. Again, in his own life story we sense the determinism filtering into his life: he wanted to be a soccer star but an injury put a quick stop to this; with a dreadful feeling of fate guiding his life he entered the military in the hopes something would happen (what happened was "Self-Discipline"); thinking he might want to be an economist he entered the world of finance which he abandoned as well; someone told him he could play guitar (he only knew 3 chords) and he formed several bands, Di Derre being the most successful; and finally he wrote (on an airplane to begin with) and he never stopped.

Yes, the books should be read in order! For an American audience, Harry Hole can be ned to Harry Bosch; he defies authority, is an outcast within his own organization, is best left alone to do this job (his office is at the end of the hall), is more of an anti-hero than a hero, has trouble with his romantic life, lives alone, has a fierce propensity for justice (as opposed to the Law) and once let loose is a pit bull with a bone fastened to his jaws. But perhaps the most compelling reason why Harry Hole has such a following is Nesbo's devastating characterization of what exactly comprises a flawed hero. Upon reflection, American hard-boiled writers don't come close to accomplishing the same. This is not too dissimilar to the way Nesbo sees himself.

Bjarne Møller, my former boss, says people me always choose the line of most resistance. It's in what he calls our 'accursed nature'. That's why we always end up on our own. I don't know. I being alone. Perhaps I have grown to my self-image of being a loner, too....I think you have to find something about yourself that you in order to survive. Some people say being alone is unsociable and selfish. But you're independent and you don't drag others down with you, if that's the way you're heading. Many people are afraid of being alone. But it made me feel strong, free and invulnerable.

And...ah, yes, there is the matter of plot! So how do we justify this decided streak of fate/determinism within the novels with Nesbo's apparent mastery of plot? The two seemingly ought to contradict each other. On the one hand, we have Nesbo's almost Shakespearean tendency to cast characters as marionette puppets on the strings of fate (the very opposite of plot), while on the other hand we are riveted by the very complex actions and reactions made by Harry Hole during his investigations (Nesbo is a master at not adding anything superfluous to his novels). Perhaps it is an unholy marriage between the two that transfixes us. His plots are intricate, very complex, the seemingly irrelevant details exposed throughout the novels become larger than life as the story closes, and they can weave through time, forward and backward, as the story unfolds. But, with a little alacrity, we can remember we are reading Naturalism and so it isn't always Harry Hole making events happen, but rather the reverse, it is the events that move Harry Hole. Again, it is a matter of preference but in Nesbo's case it is done with utter expertise as a writer.

The exposition/setting is often Scandinavia: the weather is somber, the descriptions grey-, the people absorbed with alcohol and withdrawn, if not bundled and sequestered. And yet, the dialogue and scenes are full of references to other milieus', continents, languages, and cleverly hidden philosophical references that speak to a widely cultured audience (as opposed to American writers of this genre who rarely venture beyond the borders of their land, if not their own State). And as with plot, there are no superfluous details. Everything in the novels matters and Nesbo does not forget even the tiniest detail to which he's made a seemingly furtive reference earlier on in the story. This is one of the biggest reasons why I love Jo Nesbo.
nordic-crime-fiction35 s LeeAnne293 208

I think this will be my last Jo Nesbo novel.

This book starts out great but it becomes purposely confusing and misleading, to the point of utter annoyance. The storyline is all over the place with several plot threads happening simultaneously, jumping back and forth. There are 3 main suspects and the pronoun "he" is often used in place of a name to keep the reader guessing the identity of the killer. "He did this, then he did that". When you combine that with the confusion of so many convoluted, interwoven plots and red herrings, it became tiresome and frustrating. In the end, I didn't care who did it. I just wanted this book to end. mystery-thrills-suspense32 s Thomas Edmund1,005 73

After Phantom's amazing twist-hanger I was almost delirious with glee and trepidation when I heard the next Harry Hole book Police was coming out.

So was my anticipation satisfied?

Yes - however not in the way I expected. Police is a weightier tome than other Hole novel's and thusly the length of the novel evokes tension as a slow-burn rather than a furious action packed feast. While perhaps less immediately exciting Nesbo plies us with a smorgasbord of corruption, deeply disturbing villains, and tormented decisions from our main characters which had my nerves fraying to the point of madness.

Nesbo has a talent for taking crime thriller tropes and twisting them into deranged scenarios than leave most other authors behind as cliche peddlers. While it takes time to warm up to this book it is definitely worth it. The end, perhaps not as shocking as the Phantom, I feel will stick in heads for a while yet.

As to a aforementioned twist-hanger? Don't expect fireworks and or huge magical reveals. Expect ambiguity and sneaky oblique plotting that keeps you guessing throughout the novel. I admit I was hoping for a dramatic conclusion to the events at the end of Phantom, but what Nesbo presents is cool in its own way.

Overall Police reads differently from other Oslo Sequence books. Longer and more nuanced, expect a familiar level of violence, but Nesbo revs up the psychological and sexually perverse aspects of crime. Ultimately creating a novel that is disturbingly original, with just enough light to satisfy.31 s Metodi Markov1,487 363

? "???????" ?????? ????????? ?? ? ????????? ? ??????????? ? ??????????? ?? ?????????? ?????? ? ???????? ????? ???????????, ?? ?????? ? ????????.

?????? ????????? ??????? ?????????? ? ?? ???? ???????, ?? ? ??????? ???? ?????-?????, ????? ?? ?? ????? ?????????????, ???? ?? ???. ??????? ?????? ??? ? ??????? ??????? ?? ???????, ?? ????? - ?????? ?? ? ?? ???-??????? ? ???????.
Autor del comentario:
=================================