An inexplicable book, filled with inexplicable characters, unforgivably long. I still don't know what happened on the last page, yet I'm grateful George didn't expend any more pages yapping on in explanation. 1,009 was quite enough. I think I know who the killer was, but I don't understand why a character who is not actually psychotic would destroy the Guarneri violin of the man she's trying to repair a relationship with and think this is acceptable. I don't get why everyone in a book published in 2001 seems to accept without question that Down's syndrome children are ghastly freaks, and that the proper response to them is shame and despair. (People: learn from George F. Will and Sarah Palin. Yes, we can learn even from Sarah Palin.) So many things about this book I don't understand, as well as why does this woman teach writing classes?fiction mystery-thriller own33 s Obsidian2,870 1,037

This was my least favorite of George's reads. It went on forever. The two narrative styles did not fit. I already guessed at who did what and it was a long winding road to get there. The Webberly thing read as ridiculous after a while. Lynley is even more of an ass in this one. It felt a lot of things happened without a lot of police work to get people to where they needed to go.

I d the book focusing on memory and what we remember as being accurate or false. But after a while I just didn't care. We have Lynley asked to investigate, when a former woman who is known by Webberly and other former New Scotland Yard forces is found dead by a hit and run. The woman's young daughter was drowned years ago and now after she is found dead people wonder what was it that caused her death. When more people connected to that case start being found dead, Lynley, Winston, and Havers are put on the case to figure out who is running people down.

Lynley of all people doesn't follow prior characterizations when he decides to hide something important on a case. Havers of all people points out to him how dumb this is. I maybe laughed a bunch of times considering the last book. St. James, Deborah, and Helen are barely in this one. They just seem to come on stage for Lynely's character and that's it. Winston's story-line was weird, I don't know what George was going for there, but it felt....off. I don't even know what else to say without spoilers.

The writing was not good in this one I am sorry to say. George using a diary style format for a character told in the first person didn't work with the narrative style being told via third person point of view. Also, the diary style was way too long. It kept taking me out of the story. I started to skim after a while since I could guess what happened since George practically points a red arrow at the guilty party(ies).

The flow was awful due to the narrative style. We also have a wrench thrown in via Lynley and Helen's marriage that had me dis Lynley even more. At this point the man just wants a mannequin, not a wife.

The ending left too many plot holes I assume will be resolved in the next book or the one after. I don't know...I started off enjoying these, but I noticed a drop off between this book and the last one. And I have been warned there is another one that is going to tick me off and the quality is going to be really bad. So I may stop here, I don't know. 2019-library-books27 s Karo73 22

I've read all of Elizabeth George's Thomas Lynley/Barbara Havers series, and I must say that this is the weakest of the bunch. One of the aspects that I've always enjoyed in this mystery series is the attention that the author paid to the lives of the two main characters. In A Traitor to Memory, that seems to have flown by the wayside, and Havers and Lynley are given rather slipshod treatment. The small sections devoted to their private lives seem perfunctory and forced.

In addition, I felt that the mystery itself wasn't as strong in this novel. The timeline for one character's novel is not in sync with the other chapters, which I found to be quite confusing when I realized what was going on. The ending comes out of nowhere and leaves many questions unanswered, which, in itself isn't a crime, but these questions needed to be answered in order for the book to make sense.

Overall though, A Traitor to Memory kept me glued to its pages. Regardless of the book's weaknesses, Ms. George is a fantastic British mystery writer. I look forward to her next book, hoping that she'll take time and care with it, and especially to the BBC adaptation of the first book in her series, to appear on PBS some time in early 2002. british mystery28 s Eline Van Der Meulen325 73

"Ik ben alvast fan van haar boeken en laat me niet zo snel tegenhouden door een aantal bladzijden meer of minder." https://elinevandm.wordpress.com/2021...4-stars 800-blz mustreads18 s Kellie1,048 78

(#11 of the Havers-Lynley series) Wow…This was another masterpiece by George. I have never read another book the ones George puts out. Amazon’s rating does not do it justice. This author, in my humble opinion, is ingenious. The book is about many things. The main plot is about a family. A family torn apart by lies and murder. Although, George always starts the book out in a very mysterious way. Not with the Havers-Lynley character or any regular in the series. It usually is something to grab you and take hold so you are cast under her spell. This was about Gideon, the violin player who suddenly has lost the ability to play. He enters psychotherapy with Dr. Rose so he can peel back the layers of emotional damage he has repressed for all of these years about the sister who disappeared from his life when he was young and the tragedy behind her death and of the life of a protegy and all the pressure that goes along with it. Webberly, Lynley and Havers boss, was involved with Gideon’s mother. An affair secretly kept from his wife. He is hit by a car soon after Eugenie’s murder. All of the people involved in this tangled web are developed in the most intimate way. The story within the story. The story of the regulars. Helen is pregnant and no one knows. They are afraid to tell Deborah because of her history of miscarriages. Webberly’s wife who has been home bound for so long and can’t leave the house even after he is struck down. Nkata who is investigating the woman convicted of the murder of Gideon’s sister Sonia. Validating her alibi but also finding an emotional attraction to her roommate and son. There was so much to this book. Yes, I was a bit intimidated by the 1,000 page paperback. But, it was worth the read. Definitely worth the read and I am looking forward to the next one. This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.Show full review2007-reads lynley-havers-series mystery-thrillers ...more15 s Kathy Davie4,771 714

Eleventh in the Inspector Lynley mystery series based in London at Scotland Yard and revolving around policemen.

My Take
This is a gawd awful depressing story but an essential read if you prefer to follow your characters chronologically. There is so much in here that you need to know. I think.

I had a hard time reading this story. It was well-written [I do have a few quibbles about the timeline George followed, see below]; but, its topic was so incredibly tragic. Such a waste. Such an argument for having issues out in the open. We think the story is about Gideon Davies, a brilliant violinist who suddenly freaks out. In truth, the underlying story is about Richard Davies, his father. The desperate need that Gideon's father has to prove his worth to his father, the man who adopted him. So many lives destroyed because of one man's expectations of another.

Although the initial impetus is Gideon's inability to play, George uses the topical conflict between Gideon and his father to fuel Gideon's hunt to restore his memories of the crucial night when everything changed for all who lived or worked in the house of Gideon's childhood as well as to demonstrate the "stage mother" that Richard is. Flashbacks are the memories reawakening and providing us with the backstory; it also provides the clues that tell us which character was the initial murderer while the foreshadowing George includes very subtly prepares us for the end. In some ways, Gideon's journey back in time provides him with a realization as to his self-absorption even though he is incapable of relating it to Libby's observations.

George splits the story in both perspective and how she presents the flashbacks. I don't object to flashbacks, but it is frustrating when the past itself is broken up into so many different times; it's she cut the chapters up, threw 'em in the air, and then reassembled the manuscript according to how it ended up on the floor. We read the events of November 20th in a number of different places and then all of a sudden the next chapter is on November 16.

So many questions, so much unhappiness. The majority of the story is Gideon's current-day struggle. In between, we get bits and pieces of the regular cast of characters until we get a third of the way through the story when they begin to come into their own again. The only positive in the entire story is Lady Helen. I feel rather desperate to move on to A Place of Hiding to discover what has happened to Webberly.

The Story
The Archduke is Gideon Davies' Achilles heel, and he freaks out at a concert at which he is to play it. In his struggles to find out why he froze and can no longer play his violin, he unearths a 20-year-old family history of repression surrounding the murder of a two-year-old sister he didn't remember. A mother he forgot. An entire family and staff blanked out.

Today, we find DCI Eric Leach in charge of the brutal hit-and-run of a middle-aged woman. When he learns the identity of the victim, he quickly alerts his old partner, Webberly. Leach has remembered a past indiscretion of Webberly's, and luckily for most of the people involved, Webberly assigns Detective Inspector Lynley and Detective Constables Barbara Havers and Winston Nkata to help DCI Leach with this hit-and-run which quickly appears to have a connection to more hit-and-runs, which are all tying back to that 20-year-old murder. It seems obvious that the nanny convicted of the murderer must be behind their deaths as she was recently released from prison.

The Characters
Detective Inspector Thomas Lynley and Detective Constables Havers and Nkata are working as a team here. Lady Helen is Tommy's wife with an interesting condition, and we get a bit of Deborah and Simon St. James.

DCI Eric Leach is in charge of the initial hit-and-run. When he learns the identity of the victim, he quickly alerts his old partner, Webberly. Leach has his own home drama with his about-to-be ex-wife, Bridget, and his daughter, Esmé. Detective Superintendent Malcolm Webberly and his wife, Frances, are celebrating their 25th anniversary. Probably the high point of the story as it goes decidedly downhill from here. Just ask their daughter, Miranda. Assistant Commissioner David Hillier and Lady Hillier are related through the sisters; Hillier is an ass but he seems to appreciate Webberly.

Gideon Davies is a world-renowned violinist. A child prodigy. Richard Davies is Gideon's father and the adopted son of Jack Davies. Eager for his father's approval, Richard sacrifices everything and everyone to Gideon's future. All for the sake of his whacked-out dad. Eugenie Davies ran out on her husband and son shortly after the death of their daughter Sonia and has been paying penance ever since. Sister Cecelia is a Catholic nun to whom Eugenie turned for comfort. J. W. Pitchley, a.k.a., James Pitchford, a.k.a., James the Lodger, a.k.a., Jimmy Pytches, the poor sod. His only crime? Reinvention. Jill Foster is the very pregnant, current fiancée of Richard Davies. Ralphael Robson is Gideon's musical instructor and paid companion; a part of Gideon's life since childhood and with his own secrets to hide. Sarah-Jane Beckett was Gideon's teacher with her own bone to grind. Liberty "Libby" Neale is an American struggling to escape her marriage to a drug-dealing jerk while trying to help Gideon through his frustrations.

Yasmin Edwards and her son, Daniel, are currently living with Katja Wolff, the nanny who spent 20 years behind bars for Sonia's murder. Yasmin and Katja met in prison where both learned not to trust the law.

Dr. Rose is the psychiatrist whom Gideon sees as a last resort and whom Richard insists is a waste of time. Yeah, and we find out the real reason he hates her! I feel so sorry for Major Ted Wiley; I do hope that Havers or Lynley clue him in at the end.

Hadiyyah and her father, Azhar, don't appear at all.

The Cover and Title
The cover is as dark as the story with its wide paving-stoned walkway with a dark figure hiding behind a huge, black umbrella as he trundles down the hill, the only light coming from the flight of stairs behind him.

The title is too, too accurate, as the truth is indeed A Traitor to Memory.i-own-this mystery9 s Susan Liston1,421 41

2.5, I guess. This was officially my least favorite so far of the Lynley books. Neither Lynley or Havers is in it much at all, the focus is mostly on one character and it seems as though he narrates 3/4's of the very long book. Which is fine, I guess if he had been more interesting, but every time I would turn the page and see GIDEON at at the top of it I would sigh and see how many pages I would have to plow through before I was rid of him again. Those sections could have and should have been severely edited down. Also, there is priceless violin abuse, which is second only to animal cruelty when it comes to things I don't to read. elizabeth-george mystery own-it ...more9 s Leslie Jem592 3

this book was so bad that our book group brought it up at every single meeting thereafter...book-group-armchair-detectives didn-t-9 s aPriL does feral sometimes 1,980 454

I think ‘A Traitor to Memory’ was an interesting book to read. It dissects a dysfunctional family which rotates around two human suns made important by family dynamics, a son and an obsessive father.

First is the musical prodigy, Gideon Davies, who is a minor sensation in classical music circles, a favored child and now adult whose career everyone in the Davies’ world must support.

The father, Richard Davies, forces the entire family into a supplementary role behind Gideon’s talent in every way. Every capable adult in the house lives there only to support Gideon financially and emotionally in his (actually, mostly his father’s) quest for Gideon to be a violin virtuoso. Raphael Robson, a music instructor, is made to give up his apartment and he moves into the family house in order to instruct the tot when he shows (according to family legend) musical interest. Eugenie Davies must work at two jobs despite being the mother of two children, one being the ‘prodigy’, but the other being a handicapped girl, Sonia, with tremendous medical issues and fragility. An unqualified nanny, eastern Germany refugee Katja Wolff, is given an upstairs room to be available for Sonia’s care. A teacher, Sarah-Jane Beckett, is hired as an in-house governess to tutor Gideon when it becomes apparent going to a school is taking away too much of Gideon’s time from practice. Various lodgers are installed at different times in another available bedroom for their rent money. The crowded house also includes Jack Davies and his wife, grandparents to the prodigy and Richard’s parents. Jack is a damaged war hero, suffering from PTSD. He cannot tolerate anyone with disabilities, particularly Sonia, and he constantly berates Richard for her existence while she lived.

Early in the book, Gideon, now a young adult, is suffering from an emotional crisis. During a concert, he has forgotten how to play music. He walks off the stage after three minutes of humiliation. The family sends him to a psychiatrist, who urges him to begin a journal. As he writes down his thoughts, it becomes clear to him he has trouble remembering parts of his childhood. He realizes that somehow he has completely forgotten he had a sister. He vaguely remembers, eventually, Sonia drowned, and that is why his mother Eugenia left Richard to begin another life without ever contacting him again. Also, inexplicably to himself, he asks an uneducated delivery girl, Libby Neale, who has expressed dissatisfaction with her estranged husband and her living arrangements, to move into a downstairs flat in his house. They have almost nothing in common, but soon Libby is imagining she is needed by Gideon to fulfill him. Gideon is struggling with his career and his family and his memory, so he has reached out to Libby for companionship, but he is in no shape for a girlfriend.

Then, Eugenia is murdered. Constable Barbara Havers and his lordship, Thomas Lynley, are on it, and gentle reader, so are we.

Meanwhile, Detective Superintendent Malcolm Webberly, Havers and Lynley’s boss, and his wife Francis and their daughter Miranda, are having some major issues of their own. Francis has severe agoraphobia. Webberly has moved on with his job and his life, but he loyally comes home to Francis despite her inability to leave the house, which has crippled their marriage as well as her life. Lynley and Havers wonder at Webberly’s intense interest in Eugenia’s murder - until Lynley discovers love letters from Webberly in Eugenia’s dresser.

This is a MASSIVE murder mystery, heavy with character analysis as much as with red herrings. However, I floundered about, a bit disconcerted, when the book’s construction was revealed to be on two timelines which did not coincide. The timeline difference was not made conceptionally clear that that is what is happening until very late in the book when one of the timelines was discussing identifiable events which had occurred a LOT earlier. It seemed a very rough welding of story progression. I also found the essential plot events too disparate and separated without linkage for too long. If you put this story off too long between readings, it would have been hard to keep up. All in all, I was unhappy with the book’s architecture.

I read other , and as usual, some were discomfited by the changing points of view. Usually, I have no sympathy or understanding with this complaint, and it isn’t the first time I have seen people upset with this, to me, normal process available to an author in writing a book. However, in this particular story, since the soldering of scenes was poor, IMHO, the changing viewpoints added to my confusion occasionally.

The development of motivation and the impact of childhood, education, and family on character viewpoint was of the usual high-quality perspicacity I expect from this author. George explored each character from behind their eyes, and I loved it. This has always been my favorite aspect of George’s books, so while I’m a bit unhappy about how the book was put together, the tone-perfect explorations of character keep me a fan.mysteries-potboilers-thrillers8 s Jamie Collins1,456 307

The writing is really good, as I've come to expect from George, but this is not one of my favorites in this series. The characterizations were as well done as usual, although I was a little disappointed that the lady in the opening chapter, a morbidly obese anorgasmic sex therapist, was not a main character. I didn't care much about the characters that were the focus of the mystery (I got thoroughly sick of Gideon's diary) and the denouement was less satisfying than usual. The author continues to "cheat" by letting you inside the mind of the killer without revealing his or her guilt.

We spend relatively little time with the personal lives of Lynley and Havers, but there's some nice stuff with Nkata. The author continues with her terribly cynical view of marriage, profiling more miserable couples.
detective-inspector mystery8 s Paula755 195

Wow (as always)7 s Kaora610 287

Whew that was a chunkster, and I loved EVERY MINUTE OF IT.

7 s LisaAuthor 5 books33

Elizabeth George has written some terrific books in the Inspector Lynley series, but this isn't one of them. The book alternates between long, first-person passages by a protagonist named Gideon Davies, who is writing his thoughts and memories to his therapist, and third-person passages telling of the efforts of others, including Thomas Lynley, Barbara Havers, and Winston Nkata, to solve the murders of people related in some way to Gideon, as well telling of other events and people in Gideon's life. I appreciate the novelist's attempt to try a new format, but this one doesn't work. Good therapy is a boon to humankind, but no one should have to read the hour-by-hour account of someone else's therapy. The blow-by-blow, sometimes redundant accounts of Gideon's struggle to remember and analyze his life are much too long. He and most of the people related to his life are not worth spending so much time with. And by now, the reader of the series is more interested in the continuing characters than in the others around whom the mystery revolves, especially when (a) the non-continuing characters are not well-drawn--what we know about them revolves around the same shallow redundancies, (b) the telling of the mystery is chronologically mixed up without enough signposts to readers to help us orient ourselves--the date in a chapter heading isn't enough, and (c) the transitions where events are occurring more-or-less chronologically, but to different people, are difficult to follow. (Whatever happened to three centered asterisks to mark a minor, not-new-chapter-worthy transition?) To make things more difficult, my Nook edition would change font sizes between the first-person and third-person passages, distracting from the story. I kept waiting (for 700+ pages) for George to pull it all together and explain why the reader had to slog through this painful tale to reap the few gems in the muck, but she never did. The resolution of a 20-year-old murder that relates to the current investigations was one that I saw coming the moment it was described early in the book, but I thought surely the author would come up with something else less obvious than my glib foreshadowing--she didn't. The identity of the present-day murderer--which I didn't quite trust as truth after every red herring had been squeezed desert-dry--happened too fast after all the intricacies of the long tale of Gideon's life and the present-day investigation. The ending--in which two characters suddenly begin behaving in rather uncharacteristic fashion--is most unsatisfactory. I hope George returns to form in the next book in the series. mysteries-george5 s Jean Cole304 60

Why oh why did I mentally promise to read all the books in this series? The series has such potential. Sir Thomas Lynley, Eighth Earl of Asherton juxtaposed with blue collar Barbara Havers provides tension and opportunity for demonstrating how each one's background affects how they view and interact with homicide suspects. The back story of each of these main characters also lends depth to each of these murder mysteries. I lost patience with the pouty Lady Helen, Lynley's true love, early on, but as she is relegated for the most part to scenes that have nothing to do with the plot I decided to tolerate her.

As to this particular installment, where do I begin? The story of miserable people in a variety of miserable situations is dragged out for more than 1000 pages. The ending was unly at best and illogical at worst. I did not it.

But will I continue to read this series? Probably. Hopefully the next one will be better.2016-around-the-world-in-52-books crime-mystery-or-thriller5 s RuthAuthor 22 books62

Oh man. Sometimes I think I notice glitches in mystery novel plotting, but never ones this bad. It's such a long long book, with so many interwoven stories. But the central event, Eugenie's death, is revealed to her son on page 226--& then again, as if he hadn't known it at all, on page 676, as if it happened the night before instead of days or weeks earlier. Also Katie Waddington, whom he visits in his quest to understand his past, is just fine--but soon we are told that she had recently been victim of a hit-&-run & had suffered a broken hip & another serious injury.

I kept reading to see whether these bizarre anomalies were part of some clever intention. But no, they were huge, unremedied errors.

In the acknowledgments, George gives thanks to those who helped her crank this book out in just 10 months. She should have taken longer.5 s CharlesAuthor 19 books36

Just finished, after a month and a half of slogging. Rarely have I cared less about the outcome of a mystery, the answer to which was fairly obvious. Whenever George emphasises the secondary characters (as in, the new characters involved in the murder) over Lynley, Havers, Helen, St. James and Deborah, she creates a tedious and, in this case, over-long journey that ends eventually, but hardly with little to engage the reader.5 s Amanda Patterson896 286

Elizabeth George is an American who writes British crime novels. And she does it well. Her fans will be delighted to re-enter the world of aristocratic detective, Thomas Lynley, and his sidekicks, Sergeant Barbara Havers and Constable Winston Nkata.

I read A Traitor to Memory when it was released in hardcover last year. I enjoyed it as much the second time around – an acid test for a novel. George’s plotting is immaculate, her characterisation superb. I wanted to know what happened to everyone in this book.

Gideon Davies was a child prodigy violinist. At the age of 28 he loses the ability to play. At the same time, a woman named Eugenie travels to London and is killed. How do these 2 incidents connect? The story of Gideon and his complicated life unravels through his first person account of his therapy sessions. George tells us the story simultaneously in third person as events surrounding these 2 events unfold.

George allows the twisted story of deceit and mystery to unfold in the glimpses she affords us into their lives. We also revisit the lives of the detectives.

Lynley tries to come to terms with his wife’s pregnancy. Havers is still struggling with her lonely life and her aging mother’s Alzheimer’s Disease.

We see Winston Nkata as a real character for the first time in this novel. Lynley also has to investigate a superior officer and that officer’s wife’s involvement in a crime.

Elizabeth George weaves a wonderful tale; as carefully crafted as an elaborate quilt. She deserves the accolades she’s received, including the Anthony & Agatha Best First Novel in the USA for ‘A Great Deliverance’. 4 s dOnnabud135 7

When I open an Elizabeth George novel, I'm prepared for a lengthy, deep dive into settings, characters, and a multitude of nuances that plop me right into the story. I'm always happy to reconnect with Lynley and Havers, as well as their friends, family, and associates. This is a great read with some surprising revelations about a familiar character's background. I took one star off because the pleasingly twisty plot tends to plod along, and occasionally stalls in minutiae.

Some favorite passages:
"He held the instrument out to me, fingers round its neck with that brilliant scroll emerging from his fist hope coiled around an unspoken promise." page 152

"... a Fiesta with a rear bumper that clung to the vehicle an inebriate to a lamppost." page 252

"Gideon ... led the way to a building that looked prayers were holding it up." page 5624 s Alicia213 6

This one was harder for me to read of her books. There was no resolution in the end, not that there really could be, but it was emotionally draining. I also found the format - switching between the narrative and the diary distracting.british4 s Pamela 560 36

Donada Peters does an excellent job of portraying George's characters adding so much to the story; I had a hard time taking off the earbuds, even at 29 hours. Gideon Davies child prodigy, now at 28 suddenly can't play the violin, finds himself remembering long forgotten pieces of his past, as he relates them to his therapist. Meanwhile, the police investigate a hit and run murder linking to Gideon's family. Thus begins a wild ride, dissecting this extremely dysfunctional family.
Lynley and Havers are put on the case, with Havers delivering her usual blunt one liners, giving the needed comic relief for this tale showing a sad side of human behavior.
Gideon's slow methodic recollections were mesmerizing to me, as little pieces from 20 years prior kept fitting to the picture, till suddenly along with Gideon the reader can see clearly.
I'm reading this series in order, with this being my favorite to date. 4 s Shannon1,089 34

4.5 stars. One of the better books in this series, but they're all so good that it's hard to say which are better and which are worse. I loved how complicated the murder(s) were and how it seemed the big bad was going to end up being someone else every other chapter. Such a fun book and such a fun series.3 s Elly80 12

I d the last quarter of the book. The rest was building up to that ending and it all fell into place and it did make me feel the catharsis however, it was too disjointed, slow paced, and unclear to be enjoyable at the time of reading. 3.5 would be a more appropriate rating.3 s Ray746 33

I want to fall in love with Elizabeth George. With dozens of books under her belt, she'd be the perfect author to go back to time and again for a good read. But I am losing faith. This is the 3rd book of hers I have read and and it was the worst so far. I a long book. But length should either result in deep character development or ridiculous/funny/detailed description. Unfortunately George uses length just to repeat the same few ideas/plot points over and over. So it gets really boring.

I am also really tired of her police characters engaging in professionally unethical behavior. It just doesn't seem necessary for them to do their jobs and it raises too many questions about their deeper motivations that George never bothers to answer.

Last but not least, I now have enough perspective to know that shifting points of view are George's thing. And I've also read two in a row now where in addition to multi-person omniscient narration, George intersperses a first-person account (in this case a journal) throughout.

This is really annoying.

All in all, a disappointment. But I will keep trying.3 s Rebecca Huston1,062 177

I did enjoy this one, albeit it's not my favourite Inspector Lynley novel. This time there are family secrets, murder, mental disabilities, and classical music.

For a more complete review, please go here:

http://www.epinions.com/review/A_Trai...mystery3 s Azita Rassi597 32

One of the best in the series 3 s Sandie235 22

Characterizations, plot, and writing: excellent as usual and highly engaging.

Length: Yikes!george3 s Juniper1,018 372

2 ½ stars, if we could do that here.

a bit iffy about this one. george loves the convoluted, which is great for keeping readers turning the pages, trying to unspool the threads. but i do feel, sometimes, that too much goes on in some of her stories - and i felt that was the case with this one, book #11 in the series. there are, of course, the crimes to contend with, and the cast of characters connected to them. and out it goes, and out it goes until everyone involved has their own tale as well; it wasn't quite as smooth-going for me. as well, the portrayal of the disabled as monsters, 'freaks', not fit for living was, i feel, not handled well at all.

the voice of gideon was a challenge, and the back-and-forths between his journal entries, and the investigative side of the story were clunky and abrupt. as with a previous instalment, some characters/storylines were introduced in book #11, but were never brought to any kind of resolution; they were just kind of left undone. a) webberley (though maybe his outcome is in the next book, his personal circumstances and his wife's illness opens a whole new can of something. b) eugenie's boyfriend-neighbour really fell by the wayside. c) katya, cleared of the crimes but that whole piece of the story - her taking the fall 20 years ago - was not resolved in any way meaningful for katya. d) jill and richard. i mean, obviously he's done for, but jill is way out in left field by the end of the book. e) libby and gideon... again, there was a conclusion, but it didn't feel an ending or a resolution, just more conflict.

so... i guess my least favourite in the series, so far. the pluses, though: havers and lynley back together; more of winston. the disappointments: very little with the st. jameses, nothing at all with hadiyya and taymullah. but, onward we go...2019-books2 s Mary763 19

Another brilliant British police procedural featuring Lynley and Havers. Gideon Davies' estranged mother is the victim of a vehicular homicide. She is a quiet woman beloved by everyone so the range of suspects is pretty sparse. But there's a daughter's death in her past so Lynley and Havers are soon tilling the earth around all her friends and relations. Gideon was a child prodigy with a brilliant career who at 28 just stopped playing and no one knows why. His diary, addressed to his therapist, is interspersed with the investigation. The story centers on all the complex relationships among all those related in any way to the victim and I found it fascinating. 2 s Greg1,982 18

Around the World of Crime and Mystery
This American author writes in an English tradition, focusing more on cast and atmosphere than on a thrilling page-turner.
CAST - 4 stars: Gideon is a young, brilliant violinist. His parents, Richard and Eugenie Davies, have sacrificed everything (including the needs of other family members) for Gideon, including Gideon's young sister Sonia. A quirky music teacher lurks in the family's home, as does various lodgers needed to support Gideon's career. But suddenly Gideon can't play music anymore. Enter Dr. Rose for consultations and many confessions. (Gideon is impotent...or gay?) We do have Inspector Lynley and his wife Helen and this series best character, Barbara Havers (Lynley's partner), but we need more Havers. PS: THERE ARE FAMLY SECRETS!
ATMOSPHERE - 2: In book ten of this series, "In Pursuit of the Proper Sinner," the author takes on stage musicals. Here, she continues the music theme with a violin, music instructions, grueling practices and successful concerts, and she does it convincingly. But, oh, this novel is over 700 pages and George never gives up an opportunity to describe rain and cold and whatever flowers might be in vases or in a garden or painted on a canvas via watercolor. I found myself skipping entire paragraphs of pointless, repetitive descriptions. A dog sniffs. And sniffs. And sniffs. Sentence after sentence describes what people are watching on TV. Not to mention there is never anywhere to park. It's London, it's 2001, parking is an issue, but that only needs to be addressed once or twice. But people hunt for parking spaces endlessly.
CRIME - 2: There are 4+ murders. Maybe a fifth? A big old car is running over people in the present. A man might have been pushed toward an oncoming bus. But central to it all is a 20-year- old crime involving the death of a child, and this subject matter isn't for me. Besides, the only big old car is owned by a central character but no one thinks about it till about page 650...so...
INVESTIGATION - 1: ...Lynley and Havers seem stupid. And another partner, Winston, seems to be trying to seduce a lesbian...by saying he wants to spend more time with her son! And we learn there is hot gal/gal action in a women's prison. But why are these investigators even here? At page 400 I took a break and read a masterpiece, Oates' "Blonde" because the investigators were simply silly here.
RESOLUTION - 4: I d the way George slowly telegraphs the identity of the child's killer (if you don't know WHO DID IT by maybe page 350, the midway point, you may not have read many murder mysteries) throughout the novel. The structure is very good actually, and George is particularly adept at switching POVs. I found surprises in the last few pages.
SUMMARY - 2.6 stars, or 3 stars here on goodreads. I think this would have been a great psychological crime/mystery at 350 pages, with the central family working through their own issues. Lynley and Havers and Scotland Yard could have stayed out of the picture, really, as they do nothing, solve nothing. I've read the first eleven in this series, I'll read them all. When George is good ("Deception on His Mind", my favorite so far) she is not to be missed by mystery lovers.2001 20th-century around-the-world-of-crime ...more1 Carol443

Autor del comentario:
=================================