In a stunning feat of imagination, Johnson puts us inside Jun Do (yep, John Doe), a North Korean orphan who stumbles from poverty to a job as body double for a Hero of the Eternal Revolution. The closed world of North Korea revealed here—where businessmen are conscripted to work in the rice fields and the ruthless Kim Jong-il is still the Dear Leader—goes beyond anything Orwell ever imagined. The Orphan Master’s Son veers from cold terror to surrealistic humor with ease, and succeeds as both a thriller and a social satire. Put it on your shelf next to Catch-22.678 s1 comment Joshua Nomen-Mutatio333 938

CITIZENS, gather 'round the individualistic screens of your capitalistically-exploited folding-computers and other pocket-sized computational devices! The Dear Reviewer has much omniscient wisdom and many synoptic truths to impart! Set aside your Facebook and Twitter feeds and summon every last ounce of patriotic love for and devotion to the Democratic PeopleÂ’s Republic of Goodreads in order to focus your cluttered Western minds and screen-worn eyes for several uninterrupted minutes on this update of paramount significance from your Dear Reviewer!

[END TRANSMISSION]

A Terse Intrusion of Self-Awareness

I’ve been really fascinated and concerned with North Korea for years now. I didn’t suddenly take an interest now that I’ve ex-patriated to South Korea, to Incheon, more specifically, which is a mid-sized metropolis only a handful of miles from the mine-filled border separating N./S. Korea. But I can’t deny that reading this book now (after a few months of becoming more intimate with Korean culture and history, both through Korean people and the further reading of books and viewing of documentaries{1}) doesn’t have some influence on my reading. I just don’t know exactly what that influence is. In any case, I find these kind of meta-review musings to quickly become tiresome at this point in my GRing career and only worth a severely limited number of keystrokes, so I’ll leave it to rest—right—here.
____________________________________________

{1}Kimjongilia — A fantastic documentary largely consisting of interviews with former North Koreans who’ve managed to escape the country.

Crossing the Line — A documentary about a former US Army soldier who willingly crossed the DMZ in the early 60’s and defected to North Korea. He’s lived there for 46 years. A truly bizarre story. Fascinating stuff. Watch the whole thing on YouTube here.

A State of Mind — A documentary about two young girls training for North Korea’s annual, jaw-dropping spectacle known as Mass Games. Whole thing is here.

Inside North Korea — One of the first documentaries I watched. Another fascinating look into the country. Watch it here.

Nothing to Envy: Ordinary Lives in North Korea by Barbara Demick — Read the first chapter online here.
____________________________________________

Exploded Preconceptions

The Orphan MasterÂ’s Son really defied and surpassed my expectations in at least two basic ways:

1. As a whole, this novel was even more enjoyable and impressive than I was excitedly expecting based upon this great review of it—the review that instantly caused my cursor to float over the ‘add to my books’ button and my finger to give the clicking go-ahead.

2. Once inside the book it circumnavigated my plot point projections and hypotheses and went in directions—both in story and style—that I didn’t possibly see coming, not in the slightest.

Begin With Not Knowing Where To Begin

The book is jam-packed with so much well-crafted, deeply-researched and deftly-executed writing that itÂ’s difficult to know where to begin, and with many great books, when I get down into trenches of the review I have to eventually just leave my desire to drop in copious details (and potential spoilers) at the door and just go ahead give the mountain-top view in panoramic snapshots.

[IÂ’ll forego all plot overviews and focus on stylistic and thematic ones. For a good synopsis see the one in the above-linked review and couple that with the publisherÂ’s for good measure.]

Positioning the Pen

The prose is rich without being decadent. ThereÂ’s a beautiful restraint and writerly self-control to be felt that also doesnÂ’t sacrifice beauty for utility or baroque verbosity for inelegance or bareness. It reminded me in a distant way of the pitch-perfection of several other language-master authors that have little else in common, namely the recent efforts of both Ben Marcus and Heidi Julavits.

I read a lot of experimental/surreal fiction, and love much of it, and this book is so reality-based and amazingly well-researched—yet—since it’s based on such a strange, time-warp reality such as North Korea, it sometimes brushes up against similarly bizarre tones and registers but with the more extreme heartrending ends that seriously reality-based fiction can deliver on its best days.

So many vivid descriptions are stuck to my memory now. The roiling black waters of the freezing ocean. The slowly suffocating shark’s eyes being "stupid with death." The nightly pitch-black of Pyongyang. The unthinkable hunger of comrades. The terrible blue flash of would-be escapees colliding with electric fences. The daily propagandistic bombardment of the omnipresent loudspeaker in e’ry housing block, factory and street corner. The barely imaginable callousness and sadism of professional interrogators and the barely imaginable pain they inflict upon those they pry confessions from. The grateful (and desperate) eating of things flowers, cow’s blood, and the raw flesh of snared song birds. The ability to sacrifice human life—both one’s own and one’s loved ones—in circumstances most modern human beings find utterly mind-boggling to contemplate, if contemplated seriously at all.

Soldering the Structure

Throughout the vast latter portion of the book the narrative bounces back and forth between two basic periods not too distant from each other—one revealing some very major developments to come in the other. But there’s some doubt about the reliability of the narration that’s planted by the ingenious use of multiple POVs and contradictory accounts of the same incidents, namely that of The State via Loudspeaker Propaganda and those of individual citizens, those of which often lie to themselves and to one another, as is the natural outcome in an environment simmering with such potent levels of fear and paranoia. But even in knowing the tragic outcomes of various narrative strands I still found myself so enthralled, gripping my stupid-but-necessary Kindle with widened eyes, and under the spell of a totally bought-into hope ‘n’ desire for the Good Guys To Win, for Happy Resolutions to blossom at the tips of such storied trajectories. I rooted for our protagonists all the way, hope against hope. That’s the sign of a truly riveting book: one that can tell you rather explicitly that things won’t work out the way you want them to and yet there you are, hungrily flipping pages, hoping and wanting all the same.

Capitalism v. Communism

To not put too fine a point on it let me start with a blunt assertion: The problem is tyranny, the consolidation of too much power in too few hands, and a lack of blending the best of both socio-economic models that falls somewhere in the range of social democracies of the sort we see in large parts of Western Europe today. The US seems a good candidate for the poster boy for all that Capitalism does wrong: its excesses, its moral callousness, its severe intrusion into and subsequent sullying of the democratic process, and so forth. And North Korea is a perfect example of all that Communism does wrong: reducing the individual to total subservience to the State, stifling creativity and innovation in favor of narrow utility, the willingness to tyrannically punish and censor and limit peopleÂ’s ability to criticize the State, and so forth. Both forces if not tempered by the good of their opposition, have the tendency to lead to dire consequences.

As much as I detest North Korea, thinking deeply about it is a legitimate exercise of the noblest aspirations of Liberal Democracy and culturally sensitive philosophy. Of course, my final analysis remains more or less the same (which is that NK is a monstrous dictatorship that ideally would fall and be absorbed by the South) but in taking the time and effort to somewhat suspend judgment and vigorously question my presuppositions, I felt a renewed confidence in such assessments and a deeper appreciation for the (relatively flawed as they may be) positions I tend to take on, not only governmental and economic structures but on ethics itself. North Korea is fucked up. So is America. But theyÂ’re not equally fucked up, and in this stance I find something redeeming, something that is obvious at first glance to many already convinced of the goodness of certain ideologies, but something I now feel doubly confident in after having given myself over to the very real possibility that my blind spots are just as blind and convincing as those whom I witness as unfortunate victims of brutally degrading tyrannical states.

Love and Transparency

One of the great, enduring messages of the book is simply that love is being totally honest with another person. This trite truism could be easily cast aside by jaded, modern, 21st century sophisticates (ahem) but put into the context of a story where people are constantly getting their stories straight, being turned in to the secret police and sent off to labor camps by their own friends and family, in a constant game of concealing their true feelings and true identities, well, it becomes a magnificent thing to behold in such a place. Please read this book and find out for yourself exactly what I mean by all of this. I don't think you'll regret it.dystopic fiction327 s Nataliya840 14k

This is not an easy book to read. It preys on the minds of readers, on the fears and hopes that stem from our deeply ingrained cultural concepts, our habitual comfortable worldview. It takes you to the place where you can no longer be sure what is based in reality and what is the result of an absurdist deeply satirical interpretation of it.

This is a book that's set in North Korea, and its protagonist is cleverly - perhaps overly so - named Jun Do (that is, 'John Doe', the North Korean everyman, I guess).

It spotlights the deeply disturbing aspects of the life in this isolated strange place - the propaganda, the police state, the prison camps, the torture-interrogations, the power of the state over individuals, the hunger, the poverty, the exploitation, the lies, the cruelty, the resignation of many to their fate, the mistrust, the crazed leaders, the corrupt almost surreal regime. "Where we are from, he said, stories are factual. If a farmer is declared a music virtuoso by the state, everyone had better start calling him maestro. And secretly, he'd be wise to start practicing the piano. For us, the story is more important than the person. If a man and his story are in conflict, it is the man who must change." There's scarcely a page that is not disturbing in one way or another to its intended Western(ized) reader. There are scenes that are so suddenly graphic and painful that they will forever be etched into my memory - a tattoo, if you allow me to use that comparison. (A certain tattoo worn over a heart is quite important in this book, just so you know). And there is not a page that does not in one way or another condemn totalitarian propaganda-based way of running the lives of people and the horrific ways little people get run over by the relentless machine of the State.
-------
But here's the thing that kept nagging at me in that little but persistent voice that was impossible to ignore. The main punch of this book is the setting - the very real country of North Korea, perhaps the most isolated place in the world, built around the idol- worship of its leaders, shrouded in secrets that are impenetrable to the outsiders and ly to its own people. This is the society that the Western(ized) countries tend to view as one giant prison camp that exists in its own warped version of reality, a threatening surreal enigma to the outsiders.



No wonder that a book about such a place, written by an outsider who has visited it once on a state-sanctioned tour and talked to select few who managed to escape, would have to heavily rely on speculations, assumptions, and rumors. The desire to give voice to the people of that country whose voices we ly will never hear has to be significantly helped just by imagination of the writer - that's a sad fact. And that's exactly where I came upon my stumbling block. What can Adam Johnson, an American, really know about the lives of North Koreans, other than imagine them as the embodiment of the Westerner's worst nightmares? How 'John Doe' can his Jun Do be to real North Koreans?

I believe that Johnson managed to at least somewhat capture the oppressive spirit of the life in North Korea. But the truth is, the reality - no matter how terrifying, sad and atrocious it may be - remains inaccessible to us, and it's hard to write from the heart of something when you have no real knowledge of it. After all, the Soviets and the Westerners have written and imagined plenty of atrocities about each other, and yet none of them managed to actually capture the essence of the world so foreign to them. "Real stories this, human ones, could get you sent to prison, and it didn’t matter what they were about. It didn’t matter if the story was about an old woman or a squid attack— if it diverted emotion from the Dear Leader, it was dangerous." I think I'd prefer it had this book been just a speculation only, perhaps a glimpse into a fictional dystopian society ( Orwell's 1984, for instance), and not presented as representing the life in a real country full of real people because then I'd be able to allow both my brain and my heart to run with the story, to fully feel the horror and hopelessness and desperation and outrage instead of always keeping myself in check by involuntary reminders that I will never know what is real and what is created to capitalize on our society's deep fears stemming from our culture's ingrained values. And when it comes to the lives of a whole real country, these uncertainties, these questions of what is real and what is there just to make me have a desired reaction suddenly become a real huge deal to me. “What happened?” Buc asked him.
“I told her the truth about something,” Ga answered.
“You’ve got to stop doing that,” Buc said. “It’s bad for people’s health.”

If I let my apprehensions about this book slide, I can appreciate the story a bit more. It's definitely written well, with interesting and skillful alternations between narrators with their distinct voices, with gentle transition between the roles of Jun Do into which he's thrust by cruel fate, the willingness of the book to explore the disturbing sides of life. It manages to both keep you uneasy and yet willing to read to the end, even if you already have a good idea of what's to come. The language manages to walk the thin line between powerful and yet unobtrusive quite well. The parts that take place on the sea were my favorite, with the haunting melancholic quality that permeated the pages, with descriptions so vivid and memorable, with palpable sense of loneliness and quiet longing that is hard to forget.

The weak point, however, were the characters themselves. They did feel the vehicles to drive the plot forward, created to fulfill very specific roles and not extending much past their niche. The inclusion of the Great Leader himself felt purely commercial, as the strange figure of now dead North Korean leader is bound to elicit just the 'right' emotions from the reader. And Sun Moon, the actress who becomes a shining beacon in Jun Do's life, elicited little but irritation from me, her later reveals to Jun Do nonwithstanding. It's telling when you can really root for the characters to succeed in their daring mission because you really cannot bring yourself to care for those the mission is for. At the end, it's the spoiled and privileged who benefit - of course; but I somehow doubt that it was the intended message.
-------
Would I recommend this book? It's hard to say. The Pulitzer people surely saw something really special in it, and they must know more about literature and literary merit than yours truly.

I'd recommend it with a disclaimer - read it if you are not the type to be constantly preoccupied with doubts about the truths versus imagination in this story, read it if you can out these concerns temporarily aside and focus on the emotional punches of the story focusing on little people in the horrific totalitarian propaganda state. 3 stars.2013-reads303 s Shawn251 47

"The Orphan Master's Son Has No Clothes" -- I'd love to take credit for coming up with that beautifully stated, extremely accurate summing up of this awful, awful book, but I can't. I suppose, if nothing else, I can boast having married the man who did.
I wasn't 30 pages into this farce (and I'm not speaking of the story stylings) when it became quite clear that all the praise being heaped upon this pile of literary poo (I am forever mindful that kids may be reading these ) was the work of a Marketing Machine. All it takes is a few "rave " from "objective", "critically acclaimed critics", and everyone is spewing the talking points that will make this waste of paper "one of the best books of 2012". And we know it's true because David Mitchell (Mr. and Mrs. Mitchell's son) called it an "addictive novel", and "an impressive book".
There is no way he read the same book I just finished. Nearly 450 pages of incomprehensible, convoluted, drivel.
Several of these "glowing" talk about the book being good because "I knew so little about North Korea". Good for you for admitting that! An admission the author should wise have made. There is no more insight into North Korea after you read this garbage than there is before you start. It's not even good fiction. Convoluted is not the same as clever. I could call this meandering, blathering gibberish "impressive", but I wouldn't be using that adjective to connote any positive admiration.
I understand what the publishers did -- you option on a book that is heavy only in the weight of its pages, and you've got to try to sell it as spectacular because you can't very well admit to having knowingly bought something this horrific... I get it. I'm not mad. But, let's be serious. This was a really, really bad book.
I can honestly say that I won't soon forget having wasted two weeks trying to gag my way through this unnecessarily pointless novel. And, now I suppose I can be quoted as having called "The Orphan Master's Son" 'unforgettable'...?192 s1 comment Steve251 944

Literature is a fiction that tells a greater truth – so somebody wise once said. But the truth is a tricky business. This epic story set in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (that’s the bad one) offers frequent reminders of that fact. First, there’s the question of where the genuinely dire straits of North Koreans end and the semi-satirical abstractions begin. Did Johnson exaggerate the atrocities? Did his fiction indeed tell a greater truth? Then there’s a related question about Jun Do, the book’s central figure. At some point he becomes the subject of the ultimate in unreliable narrators: the DPRK propaganda machine. Fortunately for the reader, the parts handled by the omniscient narrator dominated, and they made for quite a story!

In various post-publication interviews Johnson said he conducted extensive research for the book (it took him 7 years) including talks with refugees and a visit to Pyongyang. He mentioned that, if anything, he had to tone down some of the brutality that he’d heard about from former prisoners. Jun Do, as the North Korean everyman, was unrealistically amalgamated, but this was an effective device. Making him a composite with a wide variety of experiences was a convenient way to drive the plot. The action begins at an orphanage where his father was the orphan master, but one who showed no favoritism to his son. Jun Do’s first official duty was as a soldier specializing in tunnel combat (taekwondo in the dark), then he was recruited to help kidnap Japanese civilians. After language school to learn English, he worked as a spy doing radio surveillance on a fishing boat. He gained national “hero” status sacrificing himself for the sake of a lie that kept the fishermen out of prison. This renown got him placed as one of the delegates for a state visit to Texas where cultures inevitably clashed, often humorously. (For instance, dogs in this strange land were somehow deemed to be venerable creatures.) Then, as the dark side of governmental caprice would have it, he ended up in prison doing hard labor. This was no picnic, unless you consider the protein-rich moths the cagiest survivors gathered when the lights went out to be nice alfresco fare.

I donÂ’t feel IÂ’m giving anything away outlining Jun DoÂ’s experiences above. They were the basis for the first half of the book where he proxied for a molded North Korean identity. The second half of the book was structured quite differently. Jun Do assumed another role altogether as he replaced a high-ranking army official. To avoid spoilers, IÂ’ll be vague. I will, however, mention that his assumed role included the name, the station, and the wife of the ex-commander, but not his demeanor. The second half also introduced two new narrators. One was an interrogator who was attempting to piece together the commanderÂ’s story. The other was the aforementioned propaganda machine, broadcasting throughout the land over loudspeakers. Officials told a very different story, as you might imagine. In their version of things -- a step well beyond the truthiness of Stephen Colbert -- Americans used their lights at night (which were virtuously precluded for the North Korean citizenry) to practice indolence and homosexuality, Supreme Leader Kim Jong-il shot 11 holes in one in a single round (I remember when this story really was reported, which must have stretched credulity even there), and the spin put on our commanderÂ’s story would put any self-respecting gyroscope to shame.

The book has been described variously as a thriller, a love story, a dystopian political satire and (by Johnson himself) a trauma narrative. It featured elements of each. Johnson not only conjoined these disparate styles, he told the bigger story with nuance and flair. Had he confused the old rule and made it “tell, don’t show,” his efforts would have fallen flat. Instead, the privation and torture are palpably clear, and the easy-to-draw inference resonates all the more. Johnson was clever in the way he humanized Jun Do at the same time that he obscured his identity. Making him a de facto orphan must have been a way to show the subjugation of family in favor of state. Even his name, which an American confused with John Doe, signifies the unidentified man. The reader knows different, though. We see the real man. We see how individual honesty can trump totalitarian lies for the sake of true love.

I don’t view this as a perfect book. Certain aspects of the plot seemed implausible that didn’t need to be to tell the same story. Plus, even though I just praised Johnson for showing and not telling, there were times when I felt Jun Do was a little too remote –- a few more glimpses into his interior life would have helped me connect. Even so, this is damn near 5-star territory. Though the greater truths about North Korea –- its people and its rule –- may be approximate, they’re a whole lot more than I’d ever known before.
136 s jessica2,566 42.9k

aw man. i really wanted to enjoy this. i havent read any books about north korea and thought the plot sounded really interesting. but satire and i do not mix, so this ended up not being my cup of tea.

i do think the story fictionally depicts as much as an american can possibly speculate about a country and its regime that is so shrouded by secrets and isolation. so of course the story is going to lean into the fear and horror westerners associate with it. and i actually did start off liking jun do as a character. i totally empathised with his situation in the beginning. but it gets to a point where everything is just sooo over the top, that i completely disconnected from his story. and i understand that the whole bizarre messed-up tragedy of it all is the point, but it just wasnt doing it for me.

im sure there are plenty of readers who will appreciate and enjoy the dark humour and social satire in this, but its just personally not my kind of thing.

? 2.5 stars131 s1 comment David PutnamAuthor 17 books1,750

What a great novel, it deserves the Pulitzer. The story is told in the point of view of John Doe, a North Korean who gives a great running narrative of what itÂ’s to live or at least survive in North Korea. The voice is unique and is told in more a running narrative and less in scene. What makes this book so compelling are the vast details told with an innocence, an honesty that makes it real whether it is or not. The reader reads for emotions and in this case, empathy is the main tool used and displayed with subtlety as well as with a sledgehammer. The strife of the North Koreans is horrific. The trip to the desert in Texas to visit the senator in John DoeÂ’s point of view shows wonderful contrast. Halfway through the book the point of view shifts away from John Doe to another, whoÂ’s voice I didnÂ’t as well.
This book is a great read and I highly recommend it.
David Putnam author of The Bruno Johnson series.
121 s Michael FinocchiaroAuthor 3 books5,808

Adam Johnson's The Orphan Master's Son defies categories and captives the reader's attention end to end. We are brought face to face with the brutal inhumanity of the Kim Jong Il dictatorship (which the author visited and tried to depict as accurately as possible given the lack of defectors and their testimony). But the even deeper story was how much suffering and deprivation humans can endure while remaining human.
For another interesting take on North Korea, I would highly recommend Guy Delisle's comic book Pyongyang.

-POSSIBLE SPOILERS BELOW-
I d how in the first half we are with Pak Jun Do as he lives his life from the orphanage until his imprisonment because he participated in the mission to America and then we change to Commander Ga and it takes a while for us to see that we are still talking about the same person. I suppose that this is typical of life in that dictatorship where individualism is punished so the question of identity is ly a critical one for sanity in PDRK (sp?). I also loved the Sun Moon character and would have been heartbroken had she not left. Similarly, the Dark Rower, Wanda, Comrade Buc...the characters here did feel three-dimensional and fleshed out. The descriptions of torture were hard to bear but then no worse in the end than those described in A Brief History of Killings - just the difference of it being killing on the outside in James as opposed to killing on the inside in Johnson. Given the fascist/totalitarian tendencies of today's world, I would highly recommend this book to remind us why we - in western democracies at least - need to be conscious and proud of our freedoms of speech and movement and rights to individual expression and be committed to never let anyone impinge on them.american-21st-c fiction novels ...more93 s Kemper1,390 7,247

Read it quick before North Korea decides you can't.

If I wasnÂ’t glad that Kim Jong Il is dead before reading this book, I certainly am now.

Pak Jun Do never knew his mother and is raised in the orphanage his father runs. Because of this, he is constantly mistaken for an orphan for the rest of his life. Eventually Jun Do winds up as one of the tunnel fighters who work in secret passages under the DMZ into South Korea, but heÂ’s recruited to be part of a team that goes out in boats and snatches random citizens from Japanese or South Korean beaches. From there he goes to being a radio operator on fishing boat where an elaborate lie the crew is forced to cook up to save their skins turns him into an unly national hero and gets put on a delegation going to Texas to visit an American senator. Eventually Jun DoÂ’s fortunes take an odd turn that will eventually bring him face to face with the greatest actress in the world (According to North Korean propaganda.) Sun-moon, and The Dear Leader Kim Jong Il.

Propaganda plays a big part in this story. That fits since this is a country where the leader supposedly shot the lowest round of golf in history the first time he played and where the citizens are expected to proclaim North Korea is the greatest nation on earth even as theyÂ’re starving to death or being sent to prison mines. One of the pieces I d most was how much of the second half is told to us via third person narration and then we get the North Korean loud speaker version of what occurred.

I also d the character of Jun Do quite a bit. From the beginning, heÂ’s a guy who finds himself constantly trying to survive by doing terrible things while saying that he has no choice, but he still finds himself sucked into more and more trouble.

Unfortunately, I didnÂ’t buy the developments with the actress Sun-moon or the wilder plot twists late in the book. Another character, an interrogation expert, gets involved, but his first person narration didnÂ’t do much for me. I would have preferred more stuff with Kim Jong Il because those scenes were alternately hilarious and terrifying.

There was a lot to here, but in the end I felt it was too drawn out, and the author got too cute for his own good in places. And one part really bugged me. The wife of the American senator who has shown incredible warmth and intelligence to Jun Do on his visit to Texas insists that he take one of her puppies back to North Korea. Why would any dog lover think that sending one to goddamn North Korea of all places is a good idea?

ItÂ’s one of those books that will make almost anyone appreciate what they have, though. now IÂ’m grateful that I live far from any beaches or national borders so that I donÂ’t have to worry about being snatched by one of those secret Canadian kidnapping teams.
2012 modern-lit over-there ...more93 s Miles478 155

I'll preface this review by saying that, in many ways, this is an excellent novel. It's intelligent, rich in symbolism and metaphor, and takes place in one of the most interesting contemporary settings an author could choose. It has many moments of terrific insight regarding one of the strangest and most tragic places on Earth. I can see why it's getting so much attention.

All of that aside, this book did not work for me. It doesn't read a book that was so good that they had to award it the Pulitzer––it reads one written with the Pulitzer already in mind. The result, in my opinion, is a cluttered, overblown narrative that eventually eclipses the fascinating and tragic nature of life in contemporary North Korea. This book is genuinely tragic at times, but Johnson never skips an opportunity to remind the reader of that. He is constantly pointing out the sadness of things instead of allowing events to speak for themselves. On top of that, I didn't find the prose very inviting. Oftentimes I had to reread simple sentences because they didn't make sense to me the first time. I expect this to happen every so often, but it happened so regularly with this book that I began thinking it wasn't just me. In my case, the text simply wouldn't flow.

I understand the idea of having a relatively anonymous protagonist, especially in an environment where the individual is denigrated in favor of the singular narrative of the state. Still, his lack of identity had me reaching for reasons to care about Jun Do, and I found myself caring even less when he morphed into Commander Ga. His relationship with Sun Moon was peppered with moments of sexy intrigue, but their dialogue was often stilted and lifeless. The relationship never came together for me; it felt photo-shopped into the narrative, especially after Johnson drew the clunky Casablanca connection. I'm willing to accept that perhaps some of this was intentional, but in that case I just don't think Johnson made very good choices about how to propel the story forward.

In the end, my biggest complaint was that Johnson appeared to be so concerned with insisting on the profundity of his story that he lost sight of the story itself. The last half of the book, while containing flashes of metaphorical and thematic success, ultimately comes off as contrived. The big climax is more concerned with making a heroic statement about resistance in North Korea than with finding a conclusion for the characters that fits with the internal logic of their fucked-up culture. Ga's courageous defiance of Kim Jong Il feels unrealistic and silly. I'll concede that Commander Ga's final moments "on autopilot" are poignant and perfectly executed, but then why not end the book that way? The events at the airport seem too melodramatic, but they provide the kind of "climax" we all expect. This reveals Johnson as exactly what he is: an American ivy league writing professor who decided to insert his own story into a foreign culture. I've no doubt the author did his homework and possesses an impressive knowledge of the subject matter, but I was too busy trying to get past all the literary contrivances to notice. The whole experience left me feeling that a much shorter book with far less literary flair would have packed a greater emotional punch.

I still want to learn more about North Korea, so I'm going to try Demick's "Nothing to Envy." Maybe it will be closer to what I'm looking for.This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.Show full review87 s Emmanuel Kostakis67 88

“Acts of heroism are easy – becoming a hero is a bitch”…

A highly publicized novel; winner of 2013 Pulitzer price; baptized as an amalgamation of socio-political satire and fiction (-docufiction).
Snippets of the life and hardships of Jun Do (John Doe!)/ Commander Ga, beautifully portrayed and highly exaggerated, with a sense of animated – cartoonistic melancholy, sometimes more a travesty than satire. The clever prose left me captivated throughout the novels' wonderful poetic storyline. “Sometimes there was a voice in my head that narrated events as they unfolded, as if it were writing my own biography as I was living it, as if the audience for such life’s story was only me”.
A “daring and remarkable” novel (M. Kakutani) where the usage of multiple narrative forms succeeds on the development of extraordinary Orwellian characters; characters depicting their outmost fears, torments and inner angst, but also heroism, self-sacrifice, and the tranquillity and beauty of love.

“Is a destination worth reaching if you can’t recall the journey?”

4.5/577 s3 comments Elaine851 407

I don't understand the accolades this book has been getting. I did read it during a week of awful flu, and the slowness of getting into it may have been partly attributable to that. It's certainly clever, and Johnson is nothing if not inventive.

But I couldn't get past the use of North Korea as a setting, which seemed a meretricious trick to me. There's certainly a lot of superficial North Korean trappings, loudspeakers, prison mines, references to starvation, and the theater of Kim Jong Il, and his personality cult, provide part of the engine of the plot. But there's no attempt to understand what any of that could mean to real people or real characters -- it's just the setting for a rowdy picaresque adventure that goes on a bit too long and is rather too wordy (Johnson's descriptions of nature are particularly painful), and the place where Johnson works out a bunch of sort of shopworn ideas about identity, loyalty and deception that are not as interesting as he thinks they are, and that all take place in the head -- there are almost no emotions in this book.

It sort of distresses me to read that this is "satire" -- it's ridiculous and over the top, with its secret plane landings on Texas ranches for taco parties -- but doesn't satire require that the thing being held up to ridicule isn't already inherently absurd? I don't really understand the purpose of satirizing North Korea -- it's not as if they'll read this book and say, "oh, how insightful." And I am somewhat saddened that people feel that they are learning about North Korea from this jumble of scraps of information and salacious details. I wish people would read Barbara Demick's Nothing to Envy: Lives of Ordinary People in North Korea -- the powerful non-fiction depictions of utter deprivation, totalizing social control and the struggle to survive make Orphan Master's dramatic plot twists look cheap and flimsy.

Oh well, I know I'm way in the minority on this one!201368 s MichaelAuthor 2 books1,415

This is just flat-out brilliant. An amazing imaginative leap into an unknowable country, one that feels so granular, so meticulously envisioned, that it blew me away. There is both heft and humor here.67 s Hugh1,274 49

I have to be honest, I found this one a bit of a struggle, and I expected more from a Pulitzer prize winner.

Johnson's ambition in setting his novel in the closed and surreal world of North Korea is clear. For me this never quite succeeded in being more than a series of set pieces based on the snippets of truth that have emerged, acted out by ciphers who never quite become convincing characters. This may partially be excused as a reflection of the impossibility of maintaining humanity in such a place.

The political message seems simplistic and heavy handed. Some of the writing is good, and some of the set piece scenes are quite funny, but overall it is too much of a grim catalogue of inhumanity to be an enjoyable read.modern-lit read-201762 s RandomAnthony395 109

If Mike Reynolds hadn't raved about this book I probably wouldn't have read it. Here's his review:

http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...

I'm glad I read The Orphan Master's Son, however, so thanks, Mike.

Why wouldn't I have read this novel without Mike's recommendation? Well, I'm leery of any book about another culture that hints of an uplifting, inspirational tale about overcoming obstacles or whatever. I hate that shit. It's not that I hate feeling uplifted but those stories, in my eyes, tend to minimize third world horrors and leave American whitey feeling good while sending the subtle message that poor people without food and medicine would be fine if they flew kites or won game shows or discovered love is the answer. In movies, by the way, this is called the Slumdog Millionaire effect.

But The Orphan Master's Son emerges from a different species. Adam Johnson did crazy research and maintains an epic, jaw-dropping sense of small details. And while a reader could finish the novel and say, “Man, North Korea is a fucked up place”, this book is about more than North Korea's toxicity. It works as a suspense thriller where you want to skip to the end because you have to know what happens. The narrative blends time and characters across the landscape; you have to read closely to catch the nuances. And the themes of sacrifice and identity emerge in fascinating ways. Life is brief and barbaric for many in Johnson's North Korea; the effect is both numbing and overwhelming. And while Jun Do, the main character, has his noble elements, he's much more complex than any lead in a movie that's going to win a feel-good Oscar.

Were I betting man (and seriously, I'm not, I hate casinos) I would put big money on The Orphan Master's Son taking home a briefcase full of literary awards. Can you bet on literary awards, by the way? Can you call a phone number and somewhere in a smoky bar a bookie picks up, and you say, “I want David Foster Wallace at 4 to 1 on the Nobel”? I have no idea. This novel subverted what I expected from narrative and character in the best way possible. How often do you get to say that? Check it out before all those annoying award stickers land on the front covers of new editions.59 s Abby205 87

There are many books I've loved, many writers I've admired, some whose talent has been awe-inspiring. But it's not often that I read a novel wondering “how the hell did he/she do that?” This is one of those times. How did Adam Johnson imagine his way into the dystopia of Kim Jong-Il's North Korea and create a world so real to the reader that when Americans show up, they seem oddly alien?

The book is darkly comic and desperately sad, always teetering on the brink of complete absurdity but true in its heartbreaking depiction of people just trying to survive the stories of their lives that the state has determined for them.

“Where we are from . . . stories are factual. If a farmer is declared a music virtuoso by the state, everyone had better start calling him maestro. And secretly, he’d be wise to start practicing the piano. For us, the story is more important than the person. If a man and his story are in conflict, it is the man who must change.”

In the first part of the book, the protagonist, Pak Jun Do, is plucked from the orphanage run by his father and becomes a fighter in the tunnels under the demilitarized zone, then a kidnapper, a spy at sea intercepting radio transmissions, and, when a mission to Texas goes hilariously wrong, a prisoner in a mining camp. In part two, the picaresque gives way to intrigue and romance among the upper echelons and the Dear Leader himself as Jun Do evolves from a tool of the state to a man determined to fashion his own story.

This is a remarkable accomplishment, at once compellingly readable and scarily disorienting. It is every bit as good as you've heard.2013 recent-favorites60 s SarahAuthor 110 books803

This is a hideously beautiful, harrowing work of imagination. It's hard to tell which atrocities come from the mind of the writer and which are real. It illuminates a North Korea that seems all too real, while telling the story of a man whose feats of survival would turn him into a folk hero in any other context. This is an excellent book but not easy or light reading.
ETA: I keep thinking about the fact that Jun Do chooses his own identity from the beginning. Is he ever told he's the orphan master's son, or does he assume it because he gets the worst punishment? Which stories that he tells himself are true, and which are true enough to get him through the situation he faces? He plays many roles in this novel, some of which he chooses and some of which he is forced into. Through all of it, there is a theme of the stories people tell to get themselves through harsh realities. From early in the novel the protagonist is shown the machinery behind the magic. He harbors no illusions. That and his identity as the lowest of the low - an orphan, or a perceived orphan - allow him to what it takes to achieve his goals and maintain his own code of honor. In doing so, he attains mythic status himself. Only he and the reader are privy to the true story, and even that story is subject to question. This one's going to stick with me for a while.fiction_non_genre59 s Guille831 2,128

Un fantasma recorre toda la novela: ¿será todo verdad? ¿será toda la verdad?

La novela es interesante y dura, te atrapa desde la primera línea y, aunque el ritmo decae en algún momento –la novela tiene más de 600 páginas-, te mantiene asqueado y horrorizado al lado de este no-huérfano hasta su último suspiro. Su prosa es clara y directa; la estructura de la obra, brillante, con grandes aciertos, como esos capítulos donde se recoge la voz en off que informa y advierte diariamente a los ciudadanos norcoreanos a través de una extensísima red de altavoces y que contrasta tan esperpéntica y monstruosamente con “la verdad” de la historia, o como esa ruptura del estilo entre la primera y la segunda parte, más fraccionado en esta última, tras el paso de nuestro héroe por el campo de prisioneros.

Pero, claro, la novela requiere un posicionamiento del lector en pro de su veracidad que haga que todo eso que digo funcione correctamente.

Aparte de un par de puntos destacados del argumento de la novela que chirrían un tanto (y que podemos obviar bajo el concepto de licencia literaria), si creemos en las palabras del autor, esta no es una historia distópica: cada hecho está respaldado por declaraciones de norcoreanos huidos y muchas otras fuentes diversas e incluso por una visita que hizo el propio autor al país asiático. Y no es que los hechos nos puedan parecer inverosímiles, a estas alturas de la película nada de todo lo que nos cuenta puede extrañarnos. Horrorizarnos sí, pero no extrañarnos.

Pero, si uno de los objetivos de la novela, o el gran objetivo, es contar qué es Corea del Norte y lo que un estado represor puede llegar a conseguir de sus súbditos, puede resultar excesivamente chocante cómo cada minuto de cada hora de cada día de cada año y todos los años de la vida de todo ciudadano (hasta que esta termina, parece que la mayoría de las veces antes de tiempo) está controlada, vigilada y guiada por el todopoderoso líder de cuya voracidad ni sus más íntimos colaboradores escapan. Y esta omnipresencia de la opresión (incluida la propia autoconciencia y autocensura de cada coreano) es lo que induce a pensar la novela como otra historia distópica más, perdiendo así una buena parte de su fuerza.

También pierde gas con otro aspecto relevante, ese otro fantasmita que, con escaso protagonismo expreso, está implícitamente presente en todo lo narrado: las bondades del modelo occidental, al que las únicas críticas que se realizan se hacen desde esa surrealista voz de los altavoces, persiguiendo, naturalmente, el efecto contrario (la diferencia entre ambos regímenes es abismal, pero eso no significa que por aquí vivamos en un paraíso terrenal que es lo que parece querer comunicarnos).

Dada la puntuación que le he dado, está claro que yo decidí posicionarme claramente en pro de su veracidad.55 s Trish1,373 2,613

This very long, very dark, and highly imaginative work by Adam Johnson forces upon the reader a series of distasteful sensations, only a few of which are horror, fury, hatred, injustice, and revenge. But by the end, one also experiences hope, compassion, sincerity, integrity, and love. Thoughts surface, submerge, roil in the mind during the days spent reading this huge novel, leaving one as drained and unsettled after a session with it as if one had “eaten bitterness.” Welcome to North Korea. If you’ve ever wondered, this is one man’s take.

Much has been written of Johnson’s seven years constructing this story. He had done research, and in several interviews pointed to memoirs of escapees, The Aquariums of Pyongyang, and one recently published by Penguin, called Escape from Camp 14. Johnson undoubtedly used news reports to reimagine the visits of western envoys as part of his story, but the blackness central to the society was difficult for me to believe. However, in one interview published in the Paris Review, Johnson denies he showed us the real blackness: “…I had to leave much of the darkness out of my book. The real darkness of the gulag there was so bleak that I had to cut it out. You couldn’t read it.” It is just as well, then, for this book was quite black enough to leave one feeling untethered.

The novel is broken into two parts. The first half tells of a young man growing up and finding his way in a society that seems confusing and dangerous: innocuous behaviors have consequences that are out of proportion to their intent. It is difficult to read this half of the novel. I am not enamored of character-as-victim when the consequences are so dire.

Relief comes immediately in the second half of the book, when we perceive a shift in the balance of power, from state authority to the citizenry. The young man of Part I, Jun Do (perhaps “John Doe”), decides he will write his own obituary and becomes an actor rather than merely acted upon. We are told of this change in the power ratio in an ingenious series of flashbacks as he is being interrogated over a period of time. The interrogator is the voice in this section of the novel, and we see the power of Jun Do’s non-confession on his listeners.

I think, perhaps, only an American could have written this book. A novel of the same subject written by a European may be more philosophical, literary, and wellÂ…sad. This is literature, but it is brash, brazen, curious, and a little AmericaÂ’s pop culture: the hero molds his own story and puts it right out there for everyoneÂ’s delectation. He doesnÂ’t lie, but he spins the truth, and keeps on spinning to the end. The story is also a remake of that American classic film, Casablanca, in which the hero with a great love for a dame allows her to escape to freedom while he deals with the demons that would hold her captive.

I am not going to deny the first part of this book was difficult and agonizing for me to read, but I urge readers not to forsake the book before you reach the middle if you are at all interested in the subject. In Part Two we finally see a man rather than a victim and the character of the book changes completely after this break. It is fiction in the form of a prison diary. If youÂ’ve ever read Aleksandr SolzhenitsynÂ’s Gulag Archipelago 1918-1956, or Elie WieselÂ’s Night, you will remember how riveting books of desperation and depravation can be.

And yes, I did order Escape from Camp 14 to read after this. I want to see how much parallels what Johnson created, and because one’s palate for ordinary fiction is rather spoiled after such a book as this. Sometimes great literature demands more of us. While I am not ready to place this in the “greats” file yet, it is big, brave, unblinking. Johnson has a unique voice that cannot be mistaken for another. He brings to us news of the condition of people in North Korea, an issue we need to examine.
asia fiction quirky ...more56 s Marchpane318 2,512

Fascinating peek into a surreal world of continuous propaganda bombardment and state-orchestrated gaslighting propping up a cult of personality. Nothing this could happen in a western democracy…..read-in-202056 s Jonathan AshleighAuthor 1 book128

At a certain point I almost put this book down because I thought the only character I cared about was gone. But I was immersed and impressed a few pages later when that character was reintroduced under new circumstances. This book is a real-life 1984, interspersed with facts about North Korea. Even though many scenarios were far fetched, this work of fiction was engaging and gave me a newfound interest in North Korea; I have already bought another book about the DPRK.

One of my favorite moments was when a North Korean man told an American that the dear leader had said, “Ask not what North Korea can do for you ask what you can do for North Korea.” The American replied with, “Isn't he the same leader who said that it is a shame his citizens have only one life to lose for their country.”
recent66 s Perry632 568

Don't Give Up, You're Not Beaten Yet

After buying this book, I read 75 pages and gave up, thinking it was too dark and foreign for me to . Some time after the novel won the Pulitzer Price in Fiction for 2013, I decided to start over and nearly gave up again around the same point, but decided to keep reading to page 100. Somewhere around page 85, I was intrigued, and by page 100, I could not put the book down.

Now, I cannot laud The Orphan Master's Son highly enough to do it justice. Its excellent development of characters and subtext perfectly place the reader in another world, within a fantastic story that seemed so real. The seemingly authentic representation of North Korean life and the dictatorship made the book all the more profound and effective. Prior to reading it for example, I'd read news that Kim Jong Un had 9 orchestra members executed to squash rumors that his wife, a singer, was "friendly" prior to marrying him.

A quote I found particularly profound relating to life in North Korea:“I wonder of what you must daily endure in America, having no government to protect you, no one to tell you what to do. Is it true you're given no ration card, that you must find food for yourself? Is it true that you labor for no higher purpose than paper money? What is California, this place you come from? I have never seen a picture. What plays over the American loudspeakers, when is your curfew, what is taught at your child-rearing collectives? Where does a woman go with her children on Sunday afternoons, and if a woman loses her husband, how does she know the government will assign her a good replacement? With whom would she curry favor to ensure her children got the best Youth Troop leader?” This novel has it all--adventure, suspense, a great literary structure and even some romance:“They’re [poems] about a woman whose beauty is a rare flower. There is a man who has a great love for her, a love he’s been saving up for his entire life, and it doesn’t matter that he must make a great journey to her, and it doesn’t matter if their time together is brief, that afterward he might lose her, for she is the flower of his heart and nothing will keep him from her.”
I loved this novel, which I consider the best I've read this decade.

Perseverance pays.mina-favoritböcker51 s Darwin8u1,628 8,794

“In my experience, ghosts are made up only of the living, people you know are out there but are forever out of range”
? Adam Johnson, The Orphan Master's Son



One of my favorite novels of the year, and definitely my favorite novel set primarily in North Korea (I've read four others, or five). This is one of those contemporary novels The Son by Meyer or Carey's True History of the Kelly Gang, or Udall's The Lonely Polygamist that delivers almost everything I search for in a book: originality, amazing prose, fantastic characters, meaning. These novels might not be 'War and Peace' or 'Moby-Dick' but they definitely show that fiction isn't even close to being dead.

Johnson is able to examine such themes as propaganda, stories, the concept of self and identity, totalitarianism love, memory, etc., in a novel way. This book deserves a spot among the other great totalitarian prison books (Koestler's 'Darkness at Noon', Orwell's 1984. Even though only a part of this novel is actually set in a prison, I'd argue that all totalitarian literature is at heart a sub-genre of prison literature. 2013 aere-perennius52 s Liz2,299 3,112

This book has been in my TBR queue for years. It won the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction in 2013, along with gobs of other awards. I finally chose it as my book club selection to make sure I read it.
ItÂ’s a dark, depressing novel, as you would expect of one set in North Korea. But I found Pak Jun Do a fascinating character. Even when presented with the chance to escape (and no family to be punished for his escape), he refuses. He is a man in search of a family, of someone to love. Through his eyes, we get a glimpse into the hardships of life there. When he goes to the US, he still prefers the scarcity of life as he knows it.
As the book goes on, it takes on a weird quality, almost hallucinatory at times. I couldn’t tell if Johnson was turning to satire or not. North Korea is so strange and different from us it was hard to tell what was meant to be real. And Johnson is known for “absurdist drama”. It reminded me of Orwell’s 1984. In one interview, Johnson describes the book as a “trauma narrative”.
The strength of the book lies in its ability to give you a sense of life in a dictatorship. Fear is the default setting. Every event is under scrutiny and telling the truth is rarely a safe option. Stories are more important than facts. Identities are what youÂ’re told you are. If the Dear Leader says youÂ’re now a war hero, youÂ’re now that person. The Dear Leader always seems to be most interested in humiliating others, especially the US.
At heart, itÂ’s a story about sacrifice, about what youÂ’ll do for those you love. This wasnÂ’t an easy read and itÂ’s not a book that I can say I enjoyed. Appreciated is the better word. Johnson spent six years doing the research for this novel. He states that if anything, he didnÂ’t use the worst of the stories he heard. I canÂ’t wait for the book club discussion. This books has a lot more meat than most.audio book-clubs48 s Alexandra 921 322

Dieser 2013 mit dem Pulitzer Preis ausgezeichnete Roman ist bedauerlicherweise bisher völlig an mir vorbeigegangen. Dann entdeckte er mich kürzlich zufällig auf dem Weg zu einer Aussichtsplattform, ich stolperte quasi über ihn. Am Tag der Annäherung von Nord- und Südkorea beschloss ich nun, dass es Zeit ist, mich mit diesem Werk zu beschäftigen.

Wahnsinn! Ich fasse noch immer nicht, was mir bisher entgangen ist, da bin ich doch glatt unvermutet über eine Perle, ein Kleinod gestolpert.

Der Waise Jun Do hat kein eigenes Leben, keine Familie, sein ganzes Dasein und sein Lebenszweck ist dem großen Führer Kim Jong Il (als Stellvertreter natürlich den ausführenden Parteibonzen), seinen Bedürfnissen, Wünschen und Forderungen gewidmet. Durch diese Konstellation schlittert und laviert er durch ein atemberaubendes total fremdbestimmtes Leben, das in seiner Grausamkeit tragisch, episch und opernhaft in seiner Groteskheit und Absurdität aber fast operettenhaft wirkt. Fast so wie wir uns den geliebten Führer Nord-Koreas vorstellen, so wie uns dieser wahnwitzige eitle Zwerg in den Medien präsentiert wird.

Ich hoffe, ich kriege die Analogien richtig zusammen, denn der Stil dieses irrwitzigen Entwicklungsromans ist einzigartig. Der Roman hat von seiner lapidaren Grausamkeit her sehr viel von Remarques Im Westen nichts Neues gemischt mit sehr viel Kafka, und einem Schuss Anarchie der Monty Pythons, aber nicht die humorvollen Szenen sondern die brachial-grotesken. Somit sind die nicht seltenen sehr gewalttätigen Sequenzen aber auch etwas verträglicher, weil sie durch die Absurdität etwas weniger realistisch wirken.

"Das wahre Leben hatte ihn wieder - man hatte ihn für eine neue Aufgabe eingeteilt, und Jun Do machte sich keine Illusionen darüber, was das bedeuten mochte. Er drehte sich wieder zu den Anzugträgern um. Sie redeten über einen kranken Kollegen und spekulierten, ob er wohl Nahrungsmittel bei sich im Haus gehortet hatte und wer die Wohnung bekommen würde, wenn er starb."

Eine kafkaeske surreale menschenverachtende Münchhausiade, die so perfekt mit abstrusen Fakten über Nord-Korea gestrickt und eng gewoben ist, dass man nicht erkennt, wo die Wahrheit aufhört und die Fiktion beginnt - ich bin ENTZÜCKT!!
Autor del comentario:
=================================